Mathematics teaching for sustainable development: Challenges and successes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38140/ijer-2025.vol7.2.02Keywords:
Algorithm, heuristics, prescription-oriented teaching, problem-solving, process-oriented teaching, sustainable developmentAbstract
Mathematics teaching for sustainable development is fraught with challenges that hinder meaningful learning and the acquisition of problem-solving skills essential for environmental, economic, and societal responsibility. Therefore, mathematics teaching requires effective skills to apply heuristic strategies for sustainable human development, enabling a learning progression from the fourth to the fifth industrial revolution. Effective instructional practices must focus on including learners’ cultural and social realities through democratic dialogue. This research draws from algo-heuristics theory, which highlights a prescription-oriented approach as opposed to process-oriented teaching methods. This qualitative phenomenological study engaged six purposively sampled mathematics teachers, teaching grades 8 to 12, in a focus group interview and classroom observations. The engagement aimed to explore the successes and challenges faced in the mathematics classroom in relation to the attainment of the Mission 2030 sustainable education goals. Findings revealed that mathematics teachers lack sustainable teaching skills, and their practices lean towards prescription-oriented and algorithmic teaching methods, which contribute to impractical and dysfunctional learning environments. Consequently, mathematics teaching does not foster learning that equips students with the sustainable abilities needed to achieve the Mission 2030 sustainable education goals. To minimise these challenges and support teachers in applying process-oriented heuristic teaching methods, teacher empowerment is necessary. In essence, mathematics teachers should be guided in the application of process-oriented teaching strategies that enable them to implement meaningful learning for sustainable development.
References
Corporate Finance Institute (CFI). (2022). Heuristics. CFI Education Inc.
Doychinova, K. (2023). Teaching methods based on constructivism in environmental education. Acta Scientifica Naturalis, 10(2), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.2478/asn-2023-0017
Friedkin, S. (2022). Teacher as life-long learner. In A. Takahashi, T. McDougal, S. Friedkin, & T. Watanabe (Eds.), Educators' learning from lesson study (pp. 3–12). Routledge.
Ismoilova, M. N., & Halimova, D. Z. (2019). Use of heuristic learning technology in higher education. Scientific Reports of Bukhara State University. https://doi.org/10.52297/2181-1466/2019/3/3/13
Joseph, V., Sheikh, D. I., & Rajani, S. (2022). Inquiry-based learning method of teaching in education: A literature review. Webology, 19(3), 99–115.
Khanday, S. A., & Khanam, D. (2019). The research design. Journal of Critical Review, 6(3), 367–376.
Kia, A. D. (2023). The use of heuristic reasoning in Christian education. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(2), 1571–1580.
Komatsu, K., & Jones, K. (2019). Task design principles for heuristic refutation in dynamic geometry environments. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(4), 801–824.
Kuznetsova, E., Zhbanova, N., & Golovaneva, F. (2021). The role of mathematics and its teaching for sustainable development. In I. V. Kovalev, A. A. Voroshilova, & A. S. Budagov (Eds.), Economic and social trends for sustainability of modern society (ICEST-II 2021, Vol. 116, pp. 228-234). European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2021.09.02.24
Lestari, S. A. P., Nurapriani, F., & Kusumaningrum, D. S. (2024). Integrating sustainable development principles in learning mathematics to stimulate sustainable skills in future generations. Jurnal Rekayasa Sistem Industri, 13(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.26593/jrsi.v13i1.7167.1-10
Malakar, J. (2023). Constructivist approach in teacher education: A step towards sustainable development in education. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts, 11(7), 992–994.
Masilo, M. (2024). Perspective chapter: Sustainable and resilient ODeL practices for the Industry 5.0 paradigm—Application of digitalisation to support authentic knowledge creation. In I. Yitmen & A. Almusaed (Eds.), Industry 4.0 transformation towards Industry 5.0 paradigm—Challenges, opportunities and practices (pp. 27–38). IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1004878
Masilo, M. M. (2018). Implementing inquiry-based learning to enhance Grade 11 students' problem-solving skills in Euclidean geometry [Doctoral dissertation, The University of South Africa]. http://hdl.handle.net/10500/24966
Mokgwathi, M. S., Graham, M. A., & de Villiers, J. J. (2023). Promoting and hindering factors in mathematics teaching in South African high schools. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 16(1), 82–98. https://doi.org/10.24193/adn.16.1.6
Naidoo, J., & Reddy, S. (2023). Embedding sustainable mathematics higher education in the fourth industrial revolution era post-COVID-19: Exploring technology-based teaching methods. Sustainability, 15(12), 9692. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129692
Nokhatbayeva, K. R. (2020). The effects of heuristic teaching methods in mathematics. In Proceedings of International Young Scholars Workshop (Vol. 9). International Young Scholars Workshop. https://doi.org/10.47344/iysw.v9i0.158
Olteanu, C. (2018). Learning study—Promoting and hindering factors in mathematics teaching. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 49, 971–985. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2018.1443222
Pantziara, M., & Philippou, G. N. (2015). Students’ motivation in the mathematics classroom: Revealing causes and consequences. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13, 385–411.
Patil, G. S. (2013). Development of strategies for teaching school science by using heuristic method. International conference: New perspectives in science education. 14–15 March 2013, Florence, Italy.
Rayner-Canham, G., & Rayner-Canham, M. F. (2015). The heuristic method, precursor of guided inquiry: Henry Armstrong and British girls' schools, 1890–1920. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(3), 463–466. https://doi.org/10.1021/ED500724D
Rwehabura, V., & Kaponga, E. (2024). Influence of heuristic mathematics teaching method towards students’ performance in public secondary schools in Moshi District, Tanzania. International Journal of Innovative Research and Development. https://doi.org/10.24940/ijird/2023/v12/i10/oct23007
Saadati, F., & Celis, S. (2023). Student motivation in learning mathematics in technical and vocational higher education: Development of an instrument. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 11(1), 156–178. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.2194
Schrage, J., & Lenglet, F. (2016). Towards a theory-based framework for assessing the mainstreaming of education for sustainable development: A case study of teacher education institutions in Botswana. Southern African Journal of Environmental Education, 32, 87–104.
Shanmugavelu, G., Parasuraman, B., Ariffin, K., Kannan, B., & Vadivelu, M. (2020). Inquiry method in the teaching and learning process. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 8(3), 6–9. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9961-0121
Vintere, A. (2018). A constructivist approach to the teaching of mathematics to boost competences needed for sustainable development. Rural Sustainability Research, 39(334), 1–7.
William, F. K. A. (2024). Interpretivism or constructivism: Navigating research paradigms in social science research. International Journal of Research Publications, 143(1), 134–138. https://doi.org/1001431220246122
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2025 Motshidisi masilo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
