Nature and determinants of educators’ attitudes toward teaching special needs learners in a school of skills
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38140/ijspsy.v1i2.658Keywords:
Coping strategies, Determinants of attitude, Educational transformation, Educators’ attitude, Inclusive education, School of skillsAbstract
This study explored the nature and determinants of educators’ attitudes toward teaching learners with special needs in a rural school of skills that was formerly an ordinary mainstream school. The study adopted a qualitative Grounded Theory approach within the constructivist epistemology framework. Eleven educators (n=11) teaching technical and academic subjects at the school of skills participated in the study. The semi-structured interview was employed as the sole data collection instrument and the coding principles underlying the Constructivist Grounded Theory were used to analyse data. The findings of the study revealed that educators had a positive attitude toward teaching special needs education at the selected school and highlighted the novel factors determining the educators’ attitudes such as both internal and external factors that motivated this positive attitude. The coping strategies identified by the educators replicated those reported in previous research. Palliative and direct coping actions, as well as an integration of these two were also reportedly employed by some participants. It was concluded that the group-based differentiation of the determinants of attitudes might be useful to influence educators’ attitudes at other special needs schools, or those undergoing a similar transitional process.
References
Alghazo, E. M., & Gaad, N. (2004). General education teachers in the United Arab Emirates and their acceptance of the inclusion of students with disabilities. British Journal of Special Education, 31(2), 94-99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0952-3383.2004.00335.x.
Avramidis, E., & Kalyva, E. (2007). The influence of teaching experience and professional development on Greek teachers’ attitudes towards inclusion. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 22(4), 367–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856250701649989.
Batsiou, S., Bebetsos, E., Panteli, P., & Antoniou, P. (2008). Attitudes and intention of Greek and Cypriot primary education teachers towards teaching pupils with special educational needs in mainstream schools. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 12(2), 201–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110600855739.
Boyle, C., Topping, K., & Jindal-Snape, D. (2013). Teachers' attitude towards inclusion in high schools. Teachers and teaching, 19(5), 527-542. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2013.827361.
Bussing, R., Gary, F., Leon, C., Garvan, C., & Reid, R. (2002). General classroom teachers’ information and perceptions of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Behavioral Disorders, 27(4), 327–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874290202700402.
Carroll, A., Forlin, C., & Jobling, A. (2003). The Impact of Teacher Training in Special Education on the Attitudes of Australian Preservice General Educators towards People with Disabilities. Teacher Education Quarterly, 30(3), 65-79. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/23478441.
Charmaz, K. (2005). Grounded Theory in the 21st Century: Applications for Advancing Social Justice Studies. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.). The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (3rd ed., pp. 507-535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded Theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage Publications Limited.
Cook, B. (2001). A comparison of teachers’ attitudes toward their included students with mild and severe disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 34(4), 203–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246690103400403.
De Bettencourt, L. U. (1999). General educators’ attitudes toward students with mild disabilities and their use of instructional strategies: Implications for training. Remedial and Special Education, 20(1), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193259902000104.
Department of Education. (2001). White Paper 6 on Inclusive Education and Training. Pretoria: Government Printers.
Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (2007). The advantages of an inclusive definition of attitude. Social cognition, 25(5), 582-602. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.582.
Eagly, A.H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace College
Everington, C., Stevens, B., & Winters, V. (1999). Teachers’ attitudes, felt competence, and need of support for implementation of inclusive educational programs. Psychological Reports, 85(1), 331-338. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1999.85.1.331.
Gaad, E., & Khan, L. (2007). Primary mainstream teachers’ attitudes towards inclusion of students with special educational needs in the private sector: A perspective from Dubai. International Journal of Special Education, 22(2), 95-109. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ814493.pdf.
Ghanizadeh, A., Bahredar, M. J., & Moeini, S. R. (2006). Knowledge and attitudes towards attention deficit hyperactivity disorder among elementary school teachers. Patient Education and Counseling, 63(1-2), 84-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2005.09.002.
Glaubman, R., & Lifshitz, H. (2001). Ultra-orthodox Jewish teachers’ self-efficacy and willingness for inclusion of pupils with special needs. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 16(3), 207–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856250110074373.
Jobling, A., & Moni, K. (2004). ‘I never imagined I’d have to teach these children’: Providing authentic learning experiences for secondary pre-service teachers in teaching students with special needs. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 32(1), 5-22, https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866042000206026.
Kalyva, E., Gojkovic, D., & Tsakiris, V. (2007). Serbian teachers’ attitudes towards inclusion. International Journal of Special Education, 22(3), 31–36. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ814506.
Kim, J., Park, E., & Snell, M. (2005). Impact of information and weekly contact on attitudes of Korean general educators and nondisabled students regarding peers with disabilities. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 43(6), 401–415. https://doi.org/10.1352/0047-6765(2005)43[401:IOIAWC]2.0.CO;2.
Lindsay, G. (2007). Educational psychology and the effectiveness of inclusive education/ mainstreaming. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709906X156881.
Mdikana, A., Ntshangase, S., & Mayekiso, T. (2007). Pre-Service Educators’ Attitudes towards Inclusive Education. International Journal of Special Education, 22(1), 401–415. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ814479.pdf.
Opdal, L., Wormnæs, S., & Habayeb, A. (2001). Teachers’ opinions about inclusion: A pilot study in a Palestinian context. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 48(2), 143–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/10349120120053630.
Pearson, V., Eva, L., Ernest, C., & Donna, W. (2003). A heart to learn and care? Teachers’ responses toward special needs children in mainstream schools in Hong Kong. Disability and Society, 18(4), 489–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/0968759032000081020.
Petty, R. E. (2018). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge.
Rose, R. (2001). Primary school teacher perceptions of the conditions required to include pupils with special educational needs. Educational Review, 53(2), 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131910120055570.
SANASE. (2001). Interprovincial coordination committee for intellectually mildly disabled learners. South Africa: SANASE Committee.
Sari, H. (2007). The influence of an in-service teacher training (INSET) programme on attitudes towards inclusion by regular classroom teachers who teach deaf students in primary schools in Turkey. Deafness and Education International, 9(3), 131–46. https://doi.org/10.1179/146431507790559996.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded Theory (2nd ed.). Newbury Park: Sage.
UNESCO. (1994). The Salamanca Statement and Framework for Action on Special Needs Education. Paris: UNESCO.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2022 International Journal of Studies in Psychology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All articles published by GAERPSY Publishing are under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, allowing author (s) to share copies and redistribute the material in any medium or format. The GAERPSY Publishing cannot revoke these freedoms if they follow the license terms:
• Attribution: Author (s) must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. Author (s) may do so reasonably but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses his/her or thier use.
• NonCommercial: Author (s) may not use the material for commercial purposes.
• NoDerivatives: If author (s) remixes, transforms, or builds upon the material, he/she (they) may not distribute the modified material.
• No additional restrictions: Author (s) may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
