Paradox of materialism: Exploring the complex relationship between consumption and well-being
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38140/ijspsy.v4i2.1341Keywords:
Consumption, Intrinsic values, Hedonic adaptation, Materialism, Sustainability Materialism, Well-beingAbstract
Abstract—This study critically examines the complex relationship between consumption and well-being, emphasising the limitations of materialism and exploring alternative avenues for achieving lasting happiness. While material consumption may offer temporary satisfaction, it ultimately falls short of providing long-term well-being. Drawing from a wide range of empirical evidence and theoretical perspectives, this study argues that true and enduring happiness is more effectively attained through the pursuit of intrinsic values, meaningful relationships, and experiences and through sustainable and mindful consumption practices. Concepts such as hedonic adaptation and the broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions are discussed to explain why experiences and non-materialistic values contribute more significantly to sustained satisfaction. The study also delves into the societal implications of rampant consumerism and economic disparity, advocating for policy interventions prioritising human well-being over economic growth. Through a comprehensive analysis, the study offers insights into fostering a more fulfilling and sustainable approach to living, both on an individual and societal level.
References
Aeon, B., Faber, A., & Panaccio, A. (2021). Does time management work? A meta-analysis. PloS One, 16(1), e0245066. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245066
Auger, D. (2024). The power of leisure: Unlocking human potential through leisure. Loisir et Société / Society and Leisure, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/07053436.2024.2368635
Biswas-Diener, R. (2022). The paradox of materialism: Longitudinal evidence on the relationship between material values and subjective well-being. Journal of Positive Psychology, 17(2), 167-179. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2021.1890471
CIPD. (2022). Health and wellbeing at work: Survey report. Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development. https://www.cipd.org/globalassets/media/comms/news/ahealth-wellbeing-work-report-2022_tcm18-108440.pdf
Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Oishi, S. (2018). Advances and open questions in the science of subjective well-being. Collabra: Psychology, 4(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.115
Dittmar, H., Bond, R., Hurst, M., & Kasser, T. (2014). The relationship between materialism and personal well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(5), 879–924. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037409
Dominko, M., & Verbi?, M. (2022). The effect of subjective well-being on consumption behavior. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 56(2), 876–898. https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12457
Featherstone, M. (2018). Consumer culture and its futures: Dreams and consequences. In E. Krasteva-Blagoeva (ed.), Approaching consumer culture (pp. 1-18). Cham. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00226-8_1
Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in the broaden-and-build theory: Implications for consumption and well-being. Review of General Psychology, 5(3), 300-319. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.5.3.300
Gladstone, J., Ruberton, P. M., Margolis, S., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2024). Variety in hedonic spending and its impact on well-being. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 34(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1306
Hudders, L., & Pandelaere, M. (2012). The silver lining of materialism: The impact of luxury consumption on subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13(3), 411–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-011-9271-9
Humphery, K. (2019). Affluence, anti-consumerism, and the politics of consumption. In F. F. Wherry & I. Woodward (eds.), The Oxford handbook of consumption (pp. 560–576). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190695583.013.33
Inceoglu, I., Thomas, G., Chu, C., Plans, D., & Gerbasi, A. (2018). Leadership behavior and employee well-being: An integrated review and a future research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(1), 179-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.006
Kossek, E. E., Gettings, P. E., & Misra, K. (2021). Flexible work arrangements and well-being: A comprehensive review of organizational practices and employee outcomes. Human Resource Management, 60(2), 169-189. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22013
Kumar, A. (2022). The unmatchable brightness of doing: Experiential consumption facilitates greater satisfaction than spending on material possessions. Current Opinion in Psychology, 46, 101343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101343
Luhmann, M., Krasko, J., & Terwiel, S. (2021). Subjective well-being as a dynamic construct. In The Handbook of Personality Dynamics and Processes (pp. 1231–1249). Amsterdam: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813995-0.00048-0
Martela, F., & Sheldon, K. M. (2019). Clarifying the concept of well-being: Psychological need satisfaction as the common core connecting eudaimonic and subjective well-being. Review of General Psychology, 23(4), 458–474. https://doi.org/10.1177/1089268019880886
Nabawanuka, H., & Ekmekcioglu, E. B. (2022). Millennials in the workplace: Perceived supervisor support, work–life balance and employee well-being. Industrial and Commercial Training, 54(1), 123-144. https://doi.org/10.1108/ICT-05-2021-0041
Ng, W., & Diener, E. (2019). Affluence and subjective well-being: Does income inequality moderate their associations?. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 14(1), 155–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-017-9585-9
O’Neill, D. W., Fanning, A. L., Lamb, W. F., & Steinberger, J. K. (2018). A good life for all within planetary boundaries. Nature Sustainability, 1(2), 88-95. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0021-4
Pandelaere, M. (2016). Materialism and well-being: The role of consumption. Current Opinion in Psychology, 10, 33-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.10.027
Park, S., Lehto, X., & Kang, J. (2024). Balancing work and leisure: Unraveling constraints on work-leisure integration in bleisure travel. International Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Administration, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/15256480.2024.2344226
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press. Retrieved from https://www.guilford.com/books/Self-Determination-Theory/Ryan-Deci/9781462538966
Saez, E., & Zucman, G. (2020). The rise of income and wealth inequality in America: Evidence from distributional macroeconomic accounts. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 34(4), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.34.4.3
Shafqat, N., Ishaq, S., & Ahmed, R. (2023). Experiential purchases as a pathway to long-term happiness: A comparative study of material and experiential consumption. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 57(2), 278-294. https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12443
Stone, B. M., & Parks, A. C. (2018). Cultivating subjective well-being through positive psychological interventions. In E. Diener, S. Oishi & L. Tay (Eds.), Handbook of well-being. Salt Lake City, UT: DEF Publishers. https://nobascholar.com
Tully, S. M., & Sharma, E. (2022). Understanding the meaning of consumer wealth. Advances in Consumer Research, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/arcp.1073
Vohra, V., Singh, S., & Dutta, T. (2024). Embracing flexibility post-COVID-19: A systematic review of flexible working arrangements using the SCM-TBFO framework. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 25(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-023-00366-9
Zhao, A. T. (2023). Employee boundary management practices and challenges. In J. Marques (ed.), The Palgrave handbook of fulfillment, wellness, and personal growth at work (pp. 1-22). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35494-6_22
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 Mutaz Maawia Osman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All articles published by GAERPSY Publishing are under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, allowing author (s) to share copies and redistribute the material in any medium or format. The GAERPSY Publishing cannot revoke these freedoms if they follow the license terms:
• Attribution: Author (s) must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. Author (s) may do so reasonably but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses his/her or thier use.
• NonCommercial: Author (s) may not use the material for commercial purposes.
• NoDerivatives: If author (s) remixes, transforms, or builds upon the material, he/she (they) may not distribute the modified material.
• No additional restrictions: Author (s) may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
