Understanding educational systems: Parents’ challenges in marketisation of education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38140/ijspsy.v4i2.1241Keywords:
Parents’ challenges, Educational systems, marketization of educationAbstract
Running schools like business entities in many countries have taken centre stage. This practice has been going on unabated despite the seemingly myriad challenges faced by parents’ understanding of the educational systems due to the marketisation of education. This study explored the parents’ challenges in understanding the educational systems due to the marketisation of education. The marketisation of education kick-started by applying market forces to the field of education. This study adopts a qualitative approach through a case study research design. Twenty parents were selected from the district's primary schools and interviewed for data collection. This study unearthed that the education system is one such tool for perpetuating class divisions and social inequality. The education system in Zimbabwe is heavily underfunded, particularly public government and council schools. Some schools in the district under study, particularly those in the high-density areas, post worrisome results in public examinations. Parents rarely investigate why their local schools perform poorly in public examinations. If they do so, they find fault in the teachers’ competence and commitment to duty. Rarely do parents admit that they are failing to play their part.
References
Adu, E. O., & Okeke, C. I. O. (2022) Fundamentals of research in Humanities, Social Sciences and Science education. A practical step-by-step approach to a successful research journey. Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers.
Ball, S. J. (2003). Class strategies and the education market: The middle classes and social advantage. London: Rutledge Falmer.
Ball, S. J. (2004). Education For Sale! The Commodification of Everything? University college London. http://www.asu.edu/educ/epsl/CERU/articles/CERU-0410-253-OWI.pdf
Ball, S. J. (2006). Educational Reform, Market Concepts and Ethical Re- tooling, in: Education Policy and Social Class: The Selected Works of Stephen J. Ball, London: Routledge.
Ball, S. J., Bowe, W., & Gewirtz, J. (2023) Unequal parental choice: Marketisation policies mean unequal parental choice as middle-class parents have more cultural capital. The British Journal of Sociology. https://.doi.org10.2443/8097
Browne, M. N., & Keeley, S. M. (2007). Asking the right questions: A guide to critical thinking. Pearson Education.
Bryman, A. (2021). Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Crace, J. (2007) Wanted: attractive Swedish model, The Guardian (Education), 20th November, 1-2, online at: http://education.guardian.co.uk/egweekly/story/0,,2213555,00.html
Creswell, J. W. (2021). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. SAGE publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design. Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed method approaches. (5th ed.). London: Sage publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Education and skills funding agency (ESFA). Annual report and accounts 2022 to 2023. Ref: ISBN978-1-5286-4304-7,HC1483PDF, 1.87 MB,104pages.
European Union Act. (2011). UK Constitutional law group. Blog, 19 January 2011.
Forster, A. G. (2020) Navigating Institutions: Parents’ Knowledge of the Educational System and Students’ Success in Education. European Sociological Review, 36(1), 48-64, https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcz049
Gill, P. (2008). Methods of data collection in qualitative research.: Interviews and focus groups. British Dental Journal. 204(6), 291-295. https://doi.org/10.1038/bdj.2008.192
Gordon, R., & Clerhorn, A. (1999). What does modernisation do to African women? A case study of the effects of Structural Adjustment on the educational status of women and girls in Zimbabwe. Education and Society, 17(2), 19-31.
Haralambos, M., & Holborn, M. (2013). Sociology: Themes and Perspectives. London: Oxford
Hasan, Q. (2023). Challenges faced by parent teachers, and the students. [online] https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.24656.07682
Hemsley-Brown, J., & Oplatka, I. (2006). Universities in a competitive global marketplace: Asystematic review of the literature on higher education marketing. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 19(4), 316-38.
Hoxby, C. M. (2004). Do and should financial aid packages affect students’ college choices? https://doi.org/10.3386/w9482
Kelly, J. (2004). Out for the count. The Guardian (Education), 11th May, pp. 2-3.
Kowalski, T. J. (2011). Public relations in schools. Educational leadership faculty publications. 49. https://ecommons.udayton.edu/eda_fac_pub/49
Li, Z., & Qiu, Z. (2018). How does family background affect children’s educational achievement? Evidence from Contemporary China. The Journal of Chinese Sociology, 5(13), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40711-018-0083-8
McMillan and Schumacher, (2014). Education and Skills Funding Agency. (2021). Pupil premium: Conditions of grant 2020 to 2021. www.gov.uk
Mohammed, S. H., & Kinyo, L. (2020). The role of constructivism in the enhancement of social studies education. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(7), 294-256.
Pham, L. T. M. (2018). Qualitative approach to research a review of advantages and disadvantages of three paradigms: Positivism, interpretivism, and critical inquiry. University of Adelaide, South Australia. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.13995.54569
Ransom, S. (1993). Markets or Democracy for Education. British Journal of Educational Studies, 41(4), 333-352. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.1993.9973971
Riddell, S. (2005). Disabled students in higher education perspectives on widening access and changing policy (1st ed.) (pp-224). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780302087121
Rikowski, G. (2002). Fuel for the Living Fire: Labour-Power! In A. Dinerstein & M. Neary (eds.), The Labour Debate: An Investigation into the Theory and Reality of Capitalist Work (pp. 179-202). Aldershot: Ashgate Burlington, VT
Rikowski, G. (2007). Marketisation of the Schools System in England. London, 25th November 2007. http://www.flowideas.co.uk/?page=articles&sub=Marketisation%20of%20the%20Schools%20System%20in%20England
Rikowski, G. (2018b) Marxism and Education: Fragility, Crisis, Critique. Cadernos GPOSSHE On-line, 1(1), 142-170. https://doi.org/10.33241/cadernosdogposshe.v1i1.488
Schmid, E., & Garrels, V. (2021) Parental involvement and educational success among vulnerable students in vocational education and training. Educational research, 63 (4), 456-473 https://doi.org/0.1080/00131881.2021.1988672
Sennet, R. (2017). Class and the new capitalism, craftsmanship, cooperation and cities. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Shizha, E., & Kariwo, M. (2011). Education and development in Zimbabwe: A social, political and economic analysis. Rotterdam: Sense publishers.
Siddiqqui, N. (2023). Is parental awareness of children's academic potential a good predictor of children's learning outcomes in Early Year's settings? Findings from two provinces in Pakistan and India. Social Sciences and Humanities, 8(1), 100651 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100651
Steward, H. (2012). Actions as processes. Philosophical perspectives. 26(1), 373-388. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpe.12008
The 2010-15 Coalition government and the legacy of free schools in England. (2010). Sage Journals. https://doi.org/10.1177/14782103231176360
Theodoropoulou, S., & Watt, A. (2011). Withdrawal symptoms: an assessment of the austerity packages in Europe. ETUI Working Paper 2011. 2. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2221838
Vicki, L., Plano, V. L., & Creswell, J. W. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. (3rd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE
Whitfield, D. (2006). New labor’s attack on public services. Nottingham: Spokesman Russel House.
Whitty, G. (2013). Privatisation and marketisation in education policy. Paper presented at National Union of Teachers (NUT) conference, ‘Involving the Private Sector in Education: Value Added or High Risk?’, 21 November, in London. www.ioe.ac.uk/directorate/NUTPres%20web%20version%20(2%2001).doc.
World Bank (2011). The job crisis, household and government responses to the great recession in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. Washington DC. International Bank for reconstruction and development / The World Bank.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 Mutonhodza Lucky
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All articles published by GAERPSY Publishing are under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, allowing author (s) to share copies and redistribute the material in any medium or format. The GAERPSY Publishing cannot revoke these freedoms if they follow the license terms:
• Attribution: Author (s) must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. Author (s) may do so reasonably but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses his/her or thier use.
• NonCommercial: Author (s) may not use the material for commercial purposes.
• NoDerivatives: If author (s) remixes, transforms, or builds upon the material, he/she (they) may not distribute the modified material.
• No additional restrictions: Author (s) may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
