Growing improved crops and social justice: A contextualisation of ubuntu principles for smallholder farmers

Paulous Serugo

doi:10.38140/ijms-2024.vol1.14

Authors

Paulous Serugo Uganda Martyrs University, Kampala, Uganda https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8357-2693

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38140/ijms-2024.vol1.14

Keywords:

Ubuntu, Obuntu bulamu , social justice , smallholder farmers, food system, improved crops

Abstract

Improved crops are being promoted in many developing countries to increase food production and realise economic benefits associated with them. The changes in farming being introduced are affecting the social values in food production. The paper examines how the new crops affect the Ubuntu values important for the realisation of social justice of smallholder farmers. The study used mixed methods case study utilising a questionnaire, focus group discussion, and in-depth interviews. Three themes were the main focus with regard to Ubuntu as an analytic lens for social justice concerns of smallholder farmers: access to land, crops, labour and gardening, and food access and distribution. The findings show that Ubuntu values are being stifled with the commoditisation of farming processes and systems. At the same time, individualism associated with growing improved crops is threatening food access and distribution, as Ubuntu values of interdependence, solidarity, unity, compassion, empathy, and togetherness no longer influence processes in food systems. The results suggest the need for the incorporation and recognition of the values of Ubuntu/Obuntu Bulamu in promoting improved crops. This will contribute to addressing smallholder farmers' social justice concerns.

References

Asante, M. K. (1998). Front Matter. In M. K. Asante (Ed.), Afrocentric Idea Revised (pp. i–vi). Temple University Press.

Aworh, O. C. (2015). Promoting food security and enhancing Nigeria's small farmers' income through value-added processing of lesser-known and under-utilised indigenous fruits and vegetables. Food Research International, 76, 986–991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2015.06.003

Caovilla, M.A.L., Zanco, A., & Renk A. A.,( 2022). Reflections of commoditisation in the Brazilian regulation of pesticides, Veredas do Direito. Belo Horizont, 19(43), 41-64.

Chiaka, J. C., Zhen, L., Yunfeng, H., Xiao, Y., Muhirwa, F., & Lang, T. (2022). Smallholder farmers contribution to food production in Nigeria. Frontiers in Nutrition, 9, 916678. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.916678

Chilisa, B. (2012). Indigenous Research Methodologies. Sage Publishers, London.

Cossa, J. (2023). ‘uMuntu nguMuntu ngaBantu’: Toward an equitably infused global epistemological orientation and global (Philosophy of) Education. Bandung, 10(1), 33-52. https://doi.org/10.1163/21983534-10010004

Dawadi, S., Shrestha, S., & Giri, R. A. (2021). Mixed-methods research: A discussion on its types, challenges, and criticisms. Journal of Practical Studies in Education, 2(2), 25-36. https://doi.org/10.46809/jpse.v2i2.20

Derek, W., & Veeda, W. (2013). Ubuntu: Development and framework of a specific model of positive mental health. Psychology Journal, 10(2), 80-100.

Fan, S., & Rue, C. (2020). The role of smallholder farms in a changing world. In S. Gomez y Paloma, L. Riesgo, & K. Louhichi (Eds.), The Role of Smallholder Farms in Food and Nutrition Security (pp. 13-28). International Food Policy Institute (IFPR). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42148-9_2

Fróna, D., Szenderák, J., Harangi-Rákos, M. (2019). The challenge of feeding the world. Sustainability, 11(20), 5816. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205816

Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255–274. https://doi.org/10.2307/1163620

Habib, H. (2020). Positivism and post-positivistic approaches to research. UGC Care Journal, 31(17), 1000-1007.https://doi.org/10.1177/00208728211022787

Holborow, M. (2018). Language, commodification and labour: The relevance of Marx. Language Sciences, 70, 58-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2018.02.002

Kaddu, S., Nanyonga, D., & Haumba, E. N. (2020). Role of small-scale farmers in making agricultural market information systems relevant and sustainable in Bugiri district, Uganda. University of Dar es Salaam Library Journal, 15(2), 69-83.

Kamwangamalu, N. M. (1999). Ubuntu in South Africa: A sociolinguistic perspective to a pan-African concept. Critical arts, 13(2), 24-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/02560049985310111

Lim, L., Baez, J. C., Pataky, M. G., Wilder, E., & Wilhelmina van Sittert, H. (2022). School social workers in the milieu: Ubuntu as a social justice imperative. International Journal of School Social Work, 6(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.4148/2161-4148.1074

Louw, D. J. (2001). Ubuntu and the challenges of multiculturalism in post-apartheid South Africa. Quest - and African Journal of Philosophy, 15(1-2), 15-36.

Lubogo, C. (2020). Obuntu-bulamu and the law: An extra texual aid statutory interpretation tool. Marianum Press Ltd.

Mabhaudhi, T., Chimonyo, V. G., Chibarabada, T. P., & Modi, A. T. (2017). Developing a roadmap for improving neglected and underutilised crops: A case study of South Africa. Frontiers in plant science, 8, 2143. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.02143

Martiniello, G. (2019). Social conflict and agrarian change in U ganda's countryside. Journal of Agrarian Change, 19(3), 550-568. https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12306

Mayaka, B., & Truell, R. (2021). Ubuntu and its potential impact on the international social work profession. International Social Work, 64(5), 649-662.https://doi.org/10.1177/00208728211022787

Mbazzi, B. F., Nalugya, R., Kawesa, E., Nambejja, H., Nizeyimana, P., Ojok, P., ... & Seeley, J. (2020). ‘Obuntu Bulamu’–Development and testing of an indigenous intervention for disability inclusion in Uganda. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 22(1), 403-416. https://doi.org/10.16993/sjdr.697

Molefe, M. (2019). Ubuntu and development: An African conception of development. Africa Today, 66(1), 96–115. https://doi.org/10.2979/africatoday.66.1.05

Mugumbate, J., & Nyanguru, A. (2013). Exploring African philosophy: The value of ubuntu in social work. African Journal of Social Work, 3(1), 82-100.Mukwedeya, J. (2022). Peace and Harmony through uBuntu in a Globalized World. In Comparative education for global citizenship, peace and shared living through uBuntu (pp. 221-241). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004518827_014

Mupedziswa, R., Rankopo, M., & Mwansa, L. (2019). Ubuntu as a pan-African philosophical framework for social work in Africa. Social work practice in Africa: Indigenous and innovative approaches, 21-38.

Murove, M. F. (2012). Ubuntu: Diogenes, Sage Journal, 59(3-4), 36-47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0392192113493737

Murphy, S. (2010). Changing perspectives: Small-scale farmers, markets and globalisation. International Institute for Environment and Development (UK) and Hivos.

Nakirigya, S. (2024, January 06). NARO Introduces eight crop varieties in three years. The Daily Monitor

Ndhlovu, T. P. (2024). Food (in) security, the moral economy, and Ubuntu in South Africa: a Southern perspective. Review of International Political Economy, 31(1), 199-223. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2022.2161110

Ndlovu-Gatsheni, S. (2018). The dynamics of epistemological decolonisation in the 21st century: Towards epistemic freedom. The Strategic Review for Southern Africa, 40(1), 16-45. https://doi.org/10.35293/srsa.v40i1.268

Ngubane, N. I., & Makua, M. (2021). ‘Intersection of Ubuntu pedagogy and social justice: Transforming South African higher education’, Transformation in Higher Education 6(0), a113,

Noyes, J., Booth, A., Moore, G., Flemming, K., Tunçalp, Ö., & Shakibazadeh, E. (2019). Synthesising quantitative and qualitative evidence to inform guidelines on complex interventions: clarifying the purposes, designs and outlining some methods. BMJ Global Health, 4(Suppl 1), e000893. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000893

Nyambo, P., Nyambo, P., Mavunganidze, Z., & Nyambo, V. (2022). Sub-saharan Africa smallholder farmers Agricultural productivity: Risks and challenges. In H.A. Mupambwa, A.D. Nciizah, P. Nyambo, B. Muchara, & N.N. Gabriel (Eds.), Food Security for African Smallholder Farmers: Sustainability Sciences in Asia and Africa. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6771-8_3

Nyaumwe, L. J., & Mkabela, Q. (2008). Revisiting the traditional African cultural framework of ubuntuism: A theoretical perspective. Indilinga African Journal of Indigenous Knowledge Systems, 6(2), 152-163.

Omodan, B. I. (2002). Emancipatory Tendencies of Ubuntu-like Classrooms as an Enhancer of Student Academic Prowess. development, 73(1), 287-301.

Omodan, B. I., & Diko, N. (2021). Conceptualisation of ubuntugogy as a decolonial pedagogy in Africa. Journal of Culture and Values in Education, 4(2), 95-104. https://doi.org/10.46303/jcve.2021.8

Omodan, B. I., & Tsotetsi, C. T. (2020). Deconstructing power differentials in the postgraduate supervision process: mentoring in Ubuntu praxis. Ubuntu: Journal of Conflict and Social Transformation, 9(1), 105-126.

Osei-Hwedie, K. (2007). Afro-centrism: The challenge of social development. Social Work/Maatskaplike Werk, 43(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.15270/43-2-279

Oshewolo, S. (2010). Galloping poverty in Nigeria: An appraisal of government interventionist policies. Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa, 12(6), 264–274.

Panhwar, A. H., Ansari, S., & Shah, A. A. (2017). Post-positivism: An effective paradigm for social and educational research. International Research Journal of Arts and Humanities, 45(45), 253-259.

Patel, M., Mohammed, T. A., & Koen, R. (2024). Ubuntu in Post-Apartheid South Africa: Educational, Cultural and Philosophical Considerations. Philosophies, 9(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies9010021

Patron-Cano, G. (2015). Modern capitalism and food commodification: The limitations of industrial agriculture and the challenges of sustainable alternatives [Master's thesis, University of Denver]. https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd/497

Raikes, P. (2000). Modernisation and adjustment in African peasant agriculture. Disappearing peasantries, 64–80.

Ridder, H. G. (2017). The theory contribution of case study research designs. Business research, 10, 281–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-017-0045-z

Ruzzante, S., Labarta, R., & Bilton, A. (2021). Adoption of agricultural technology in the developing world: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. World Development, 146, 105599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.10559

Samkange, S., & Samkange, T. M. (1980). Hunhuism or Ubuntuism: A Zimbabwe Indigenous political philosophy. Graham Publishers.

Skinner, J. (2010). Book Review: Edward A. Comor, Consumption and the Globalization Project: International Hegemony and the Annihilation of Time. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008. Media, Culture & Society, 32(1), 164–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437100320011003

Smith, L. T. (2021). Decolonising methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. Zed Books.

Sogn-Grundvåg, G., Larsen, T. A., & Young, J. A. (2013). The value of line-caught and other attributes: An exploration of price premiums for chilled fish in UK supermarkets. Marine Policy, 38, 41-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2012.05.017

Van der Merwe, W. L. (1996). Philosophy and the multi-cultural context of (post) apartheid South Africa. Ethical perspectives, 3(2), 76-90. https://doi.org/10.2143/EP.3.2.563038

Van Breda, A. D. (2019). Developing the notion of Ubuntu as African theory for social work practice. Social Work, 55(4), 439-450.https://dx.doi.org/10.15270/52-2-762

Vercillo, S., Kuuire, V. Z., Armah, F. A., & Luginaah, I. (2015). Does the New Alliance for Food Security and Nutrition impose biotechnology on smallholder farmers in Africa?. Global bioethics, 26(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/11287462.2014.1002294