Sociality and the Need for the Epistemology of Social Relatedness: IJSS Editorial Statement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51986/ijss-2021.vol1.01Keywords:
Sociality studies, IJSS, Social relatedness, Editorial statement, Publishing social issuesAbstract
As our inaugural statement, this article conceptualises sociality, which forms the focus of the "Interdisciplinary Journal of Sociality Studies". We reinvigorated its “scope and focus” for the cognisance of our potential authors. We also explicated, step by step, our fundamental editorial process, including the issue of originality, trustworthiness and misconduct, ethical considerations, citation and referencing style, disclosure and conflict of interest, permissions and acknowledgement, as part of our quality production process. The article also presents the academic background of all our inaugural editorial team to display the potential of IJSS towards the production of quality knowledge on sociality studies. Based on this exploration, we conclude that IJSS accommodates any scholarly articles that solve social-related problems with an iota of sociological and emancipatory tendency involving humans and their relationships with but not limited to environment, objects and subjects. Therefore, we recommend that all potential authors ensure that the author guidelines' instructions are strictly adhered to while preparing for submission.
References
Amit, V., Anderson, S., Caputo, V., Postill, J., Reed-Danahay, D., & Vargas-Cetina, G. (2015). Thinking through sociality: The importance of mid-level concepts. In V. Amit (Eds.), Thinking through sociality and anthropological interrogation of key concepts (pp. 1-26). Oxford: Berghahn Books.
Becker, E., Jahn, T., & Stiess, I. (1999). Exploring uncommon ground: Sustainability and the social sciences. In E. Becker and T. Jahn (Eds.), Sustainability and the social sciences: A Cross-disciplinary approach to integrating environmental considerations into theoretical reorientation (pp. 1-22). London: Zed Books.
Burkart, J. M. (2017). Evolution and consequences of sociality. In J. Call, G. M. Burghardt, I. M. Pepperberg, C. T. Snowdon and T. Zentall (Eds.), APA handbook of comparative psychology: Basic concepts, methods, neural substrate, and behaviour (pp. 257–271). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000011-013
ERRCDF. (2019). Education Research and Rural Community Development Forum. https://www.errcd.com/author-guidelines
Jefferson, T., Wager, E., & Davidoff, F. (2002). Measuring the quality of editorial peer review. Jama, 287(21), 2786-2790.
Karpov A. O. (2016). Socialisation for the Knowledge society. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 11(10), 3487-3496. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1114688.pdf
Kratochvíl, J., Plch, L., Sebera, M., & Kori?áková, E. (2020). Evaluation of untrustworthy journals: Transition from formal criteria to a complex view. Learned Publishing, 33(3), 308-322. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1299
Long, N.J., & H.L. Moore. (2013). Introduction. In N.J. Long and H.L. Moore (Eds.), Sociality: New directions (pp.1–24). Oxford: Berghahn.
Omodan, B. I., & Khanare, F. P. (2021). Transforming the marginalised via IJRCS: The need to rejig rural and community studies towards emancipation. Interdisciplinary Journal of Rural and Community Studies, 3(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.51986/ijrcs-2021.vol3.01.01
Silk, J. B. (2007). The adaptive value of sociality in mammalian groups. Biological Sciences, 362(1480), 539–559. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2006.1994
Titumir, R. A. M., Afrin, T., & Islam, M. S. (2020). Traditional knowledge, institutions and human sociality in sustainable use and conservation of biodiversity of the Sundarbans of Bangladesh. Managing Socio-ecological production landscapes and seascapes for sustainable communities in Asia (pp. 67-92). Singapore: Springer.
Toren, C. (2013). Imagining the world that warrants our imagination: The revelation of ontogeny. In N.J. Long and H.L. Moore (Eds.), Sociality: New directions (pp. 43–59). Oxford: Berghahn.
Tuomela, R. (2007). The philosophy of sociality: The shared point of view. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wey, T., Blumstein, D. T., Shen, W., & Jordán, F. (2008). Social network analysis of animal behaviour: A promising tool for the study of sociality. Animal Behaviour, 75(2), 333-344.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2021 Bunmi Isaiah Omodan, Bekithemba Dube
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.