Pedagogical responsiveness: Focus on the Ukuqonda institute’s mode of engagement in mathematics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38140/ijss-2024.vol4.s1.02Keywords:
Collaborative autoethnography, equivalence, mode of engagement, narrative analysis, pedagogical responsivenessAbstract
This paper was prompted by mathematics teachers’ challenges in implementing the proposed framework that centres on teaching for understanding, as opposed to teaching aimed at producing marks as evidence of achievement. Teaching for understanding in mathematics, among other factors, requires the creation of engaging and inclusive learning environments underpinned by teachers’ pedagogical responsiveness to the diverse needs of learners. We investigated pedagogical responsiveness, focusing on the Ukuqonda Institute’s mode of engagement in mathematics. We specifically pursued two research questions: 1) What are the key elements of the Ukuqonda Institute’s mode of engagement in mathematics? and 2) What characterised the pedagogical responsiveness of mathematics educators at the Ukuqonda Institute? We adopted collaborative autoethnography and used two data sets generated from audio recordings captured by the authors. We employed narrative analysis and organised the findings using the characteristics of pedagogical responsiveness as heuristic devices. The findings show that the participants’ pedagogical responsiveness was stimulated by the iterative process of team planning, deliberate implementation, and reflection. The prevalent characteristics were learner interactions, learner focus, inclusivity, dialogue and relationality, knowledge work, social justice, and equity. We recommend that similar studies be conducted targeting pedagogical responsiveness with a focus on other mathematical themes. Furthermore, this study suggests that, to remain pedagogically responsive, there should be constructive alignment among the types of tasks, questions, classroom interactions, and targeted content that underpin mathematics teaching and learning across different educational levels.
References
Adams, T. E., & Herrmann, A. F. (2020). Expanding our autoethnographic future. Journal of Autoethnography, 1(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1525/joae.2020.1.1.1
Adams, T. E., Boylorn, R. M., & Tillmann, L. M. (2021). Advances in autoethnography and narrative inquiry. Advances in Autoethnography and Narrative Inquiry: Reflections on the Legacy of Carolyn Ellis and Arthur Bochner. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003035763
Ardiansari, L., Suryadi, D., & Dasari, D. (2020). The concept image of students and teachers about the equal sign. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(12), 6751-6764. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081240
Bitsch, V. (2005). Qualitative research: A grounded theory example and evaluation criteria. Journal of agribusiness, 23(1), 75–91.
Bleakley, A. (2005). Stories as data, data as stories: making sense of narrative inquiry in clinical education. Medical education, 39(5), 534–540. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02126.x
Department of Basic Education. (2011). Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement Further Education and Training Grade 10-12 Mathematics. Pretoria, South Africa.
Department of Basic Education. (2018). Mathematics teaching and learning framework for South Africa: Teaching mathematics for understanding. Pretoria, South Africa.
Doyle, T. (2023). Helping students learn in a learner-centred environment: A guide to facilitating learning in higher education. Routledge.
Dunning, A. (2023). A framework for selecting strategies for whole-class discussions. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 26(4), 433–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-022-09536-5
Durksen, T. L., Way, J., Bobis, J., Anderson, J., Skilling, K., & Martin, A. J. (2017). Motivation and engagement in mathematics: a qualitative framework for teacher-student interactions. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 29, 163-181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-017-0199-1
Gaillard, C. (2019). Finding the missing variables: A systematic review of mathematics improvement strategies for South African public schools. South African Journal of Education, 39(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v39n3a1582
Guba, E.G., & Lincoln, Y.S. (1989). Fourth-generation evaluation. Sage Publications.
Irvine, J. (2020). Positively influencing student engagement and attitude in mathematics through an instructional intervention using reform mathematics principles. Journal of Education and Learning, 9(2), 48–75. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v9n2p48
Jayabalan, S. J. K. (2023). Responsive and responsible learning in the Malaysian education system: A game changer. In Cases on Responsive and Responsible Learning in Higher Education (pp. 42-53). IGI Global.
Krull, G. E. (2022). Learning with low tech: Challenges of moving to remote learning in a time of disruption. Pedagogical Responsiveness in Complex Contexts: Issues of Transformation, Inclusion and Equity, 55–73.
Maamin, M., Maat, S.M., & H. Iksan, Z. (2022). The influence of student engagement on mathematical achievement among secondary school students. Mathematics, 10(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10010041
Mbhiza, H.W., Masilo, M., Jojo, Z., Machaba, F. (2022). Emerging Realities from COVID-19 and the Fourth Industrial Revolution: Mathematics Education Lecturers’ Collaborative Autoethnographic Experiences. In: Chirinda, B., Luneta, K., Uworwabayeho, A. (eds) Mathematics Education in Africa. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13927-7_10
McConney, M., & Perry, M. (2011). A change in questioning tactics: Prompting student autonomy. Investigations in mathematics learning, 3(3), 26–45.
Nkambule, T., & Mbhiza, H. (2022). Teaching and learning to support pedagogical responsiveness to complex educational contexts: A case of pre-service teachers. In Pedagogical Responsiveness in Complex Contexts: Issues of Transformation, Inclusion and Equity (pp. 133-149). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Palatnik, A., & Koichu, B. (2017). Sense-making in the context of algebraic activities. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 95(3), 245-262.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9744-1
Polkinghorne, D. E. (1995). Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 8(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839950080103
Soliva, R. (2007). Landscape stories: using ideal type narratives as a heuristic device in rural studies. Journal of Rural Studies, 23(1), 62–74.
Tripp D (2012). Critical incidents in teaching: Developing professional judgments. Routledge.
Vimbelo, S., & Bayaga, A. (2024). Transforming mathematics education in TVET colleges through humanising pedagogy: An exploration of teaching approaches, student engagement, and real-life examples. IETE Journal of Education, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09747338.2024.2324808
Waghid, Y., Waghid, Z., Waghid, F. (2022). Pedagogical Responsiveness and Claims of Democratic Citizenship Education in Africa. In: Walton, E., Osman, R. (eds) Pedagogical Responsiveness in Complex Contexts. Inclusive Learning and Educational Equity, vol 9. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12718-2_2
Walton, E., & Osman, R. (2022). Pedagogical responsiveness in complex contexts. In E. Walton, & R. Osman (Eds) Pedagogical Responsiveness in Complex Contexts (pp. 1 – 20). Springer.
Walton, E., Andrews, D., & Osman, R. (2019). Professional judgment in and for complex social and educational contexts. Southern African Review of Education with Education with Production, 25(1), 5–15.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 Satsope Maoto, Manare Setati, Gabriel Mphuthi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
