Phenomenon of differentiation as a basic condition for inclusion in primary education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38140/ijsie.v1i2.1486Keywords:
internal differentiation, inclusive education, pedagogical means of differentiated teaching, individualization, qualitative research design.Abstract
This study focuses on the current trend of increasing the quality of education, which brings with it increased demands on teacher competences in the implementation of differentiated instruction for primary students from the very beginning of schooling. The key subject of the study investigation is the inclusive concept of differentiated instruction, which represents a complex modification of the educational content, process, product and evaluation of the educational process. According to the Strategies of Educational Policy of the Czech Republic until 2030+, ensuring comparable and high-quality teaching in primary schools by introducing internal differentiation and individualisation is a key strategy for improving heterogeneous collectives' teaching quality. However, teachers are not sufficiently prepared for this reality, and very little relevant literature exists. Using a qualitative study design that includes participant observation and semi-structured interviews with seven teachers from three regions of the Czech Republic, this paper seeks to systematically map the implementation of these pedagogical strategies in the years 2021-2023 with first- and second-year primary students in the subjects of Czech language and mathematics. A multi-case study of seven teachers presents a longitudinal study of the implementation of differentiated teaching strategies with a focus on its inclusive concept, which is reflected in all components of the educational process. This dissertation highlights the urgent need for further study in this critically important area, especially considering the lack of exploration of pedagogical means of differentiation and individualisation in the Czech study field.
References
Akhavan, N. (2022). At the Reading Table with Striving Readers: Achieving Equity by Scaffolding Strengths. Montgomery: Benchmark Education.
Amholt, T. T., Dammeyer, J., Carter, R., & Niclasen, J. (2020). Psychological well-being and academic achievement among school-aged children: A systematic review. Child Indicators Study, 13, 1523-1548.
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. P., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman
Barto?ová, M., & Vítková, M. (2017). Spole?né vzd?lávání orientované na posílení kompetencí u?itel? a žák? v inkluzivním prost?edí školy. Masarykova univerzita.
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. David McKay Company.
Brighton, C. M., Hertberg, H. L., Moon, T. R., Tomlinson, C. A., & Callahan, C. M. (2005). The Feasibility of High-end Learning in a Diverse Middle School. National Study Center on the Gifted and Talented..
Brown, B. A. (2004). Discursive identity: Assimilation into the culture of science and its implications for minority students. Journal of Study in Science Teaching, 41(8), 810-834. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20228.
Bruner, J. S. (1978). The Role of Dialogue in Language Acquisition“. In A. Sinclair, R. J. Jarvelle, & W. J. M. Levelt (eds.), The Child’s Concept of Language. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Bula, M., & Nehyba, J. (2022). Charakteristika a efekt program? na podporu well-beingu ve vzd?lávání adolescent?: P?ehledová studie. Studia paedagogica, 27(3), 63–97. https://doi.org/10.5817/SP2022-3-3
Coubergs, C., Struyven, K., Engels, N., Cools, W., and De Martelaer, K. (2013). Binnenklas-Differentiatie. Leerkansen Voor Alle Leerlingen. Uitgeverij Acco
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1995). Human autonomy: The basis for true self-esteem. In Efficacy, agency, and self-esteem (pp. 31-49). Boston, MA: Springer US.
Deunk, M. I., Smale-Jacobse, A. E., de Boer, H., Doolaard, S., & Bosker, R. J. (2018). Effective differentiation practices: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on the cognitive effects of differentiation practices in primary education. Educational Research Review, 24, 31–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.02.002
Doubet, K. J., & Hockett, J. A. (2017). Classroom discourse as civil discourse. Educational Leadership, 75(3), 56-60.
Duchovi?ová, J., & Kole?áková, R. Š. (2020). Preconceptions about the selected phenomenon of "success" as a potential identification tool for giftedness in children of pre-primary education. Ad Alta: Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 10(2), 103–111
Finkelstein, S., Sharma, U., & Furlonger, B. (2019). The inclusive practices of classroom teachers: a scoping review and thematic analysis. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 25(6), 735-762. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2019.1572232
Finkelstein, S., Sharma, U., & Furlonger, B. (2021). Inkluzivní postupy t?ídních u?itel?: P?ehled a tematická analýza. International Journal of Inclusive Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2019.1572232
Flick, U., Von Kardorff, E., & Steinke, I. (2004). What is qualitative research? An introduction to the field. In U. Flick, E. Von Kardorff, & I. Steinke (Eds.), A companion to qualitative research (pp. 3–11). London: SAGE Publications.
Fry?, J., Matušková, Z., Katzová, P., Ková?, K., Beran, J., Valachová, I., Seifert, L., B??áková, M., & Hrdli?ka, F. (2020). Strategie vzd?lávací politiky ?eské republiky do roku 2030+. Ministerstvo školství, mládeže a t?lovýchovy.
Gaitas, S., Carêto, C., Peixoto, F., & Castro Silva, J. (2022). Differentiated instruction: ‘To be, or not to be, that is the question’. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 1(17), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2022.2119290
Hájková, V. & Strnadová, I. (2013). Denotace inkluzivního vzd?lávání s odkazem pro vzd?lávací praxi v ?eské republice. Pedagogika, 13(2), 252–258.
Helus, Z., Lukášová, H., Kratochvílová, J., Rýdl, K., Spilková, V., & Zdražil, T. (2012). Prom?ny pojetí vzd?lávání a školního hodnocení: Filozofická východiska a pedagogické souvislosti. Praha: Asociace waldorfských škol ?R.
Hendl, J. (2005). Kvalitativní výzkum. Protál
Hendl, J. (2023). Kvalitativní výzkum: základní teorie, metody a aplikace. PORTÁL sro.
Hloušková, L., Trnková, K., Lazarová, B., & Pol, M. (2015). Diverzita žák?: Téma pro vedení školy. Studia paedagogica, 20(2), 105-126. https://doi.org/10.5817/SP2015-2-6
Janiš, K., & Ond?ejová, E. (2006). Slovník pojm? z obecné didaktiky. Opava: Slezská univerzita, Filozoficko-p?írodov?decká fakulta, Ústav pedagogických a psychologických v?d. -it is complet citation
Kasíková, H., & Straková, J. (Eds.). (2011). Diverzita a diferenciace v základním vzd?lávání. Karolinum.
Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2014). Sociocultural theory and the pedagogical imperative in L2 education: Vygotskian praxis and the research/practice divide. New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203813850
Lauria, J. (2010). Differentiation through learning-style responsive strategies. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 47(1), 24–29.
Lindner, K.-T., Alnahdi, G. H., Wahl, S., & Schwab, S. (2019). Perceived differentiation and personalization teaching approaches in inclusive classrooms: Perspectives of students and teachers. Frontiers in Education, 4(58), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00058
McGillicuddy, D. (2021). “They would make you feel stupid”-Ability grouping, Children’s friendships and psychosocial Wellbeing in Irish primary school. Learning and Instruction, 75, 101492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101492
Melesse, T., & Belay, S. (2022). Differentiating instruction in primary and middle schools: Does variation in students’ learning attributes matter. Cogent Education, 9(1), 2105552. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2105552
Novotná, H., & Špa?ek, O. (2019). Metody výzkumu ve spole?enských v?dách (M. Š?oví?ková, Ed.). FHS UK.
Piaget, J. (1966). Response to Brian Sutton-Smith. Psychological Review, 73(1), 111.distan?ní text. Univerzita Karlova v Praze, Pedagogická fakulta.
Poehner, M. E. (2008). Dynamic assessment: A Vygotskian approach to understanding and promoting second language development. Springer.
Pr?cha, J., & Šva?í?ek, R. (2009). Etický kodex ?eské pedagogické v?dy a výzkumu. Pedagogická orientace, 19(2), 89–105.
Reis, S. M., McCoach, D. B., Little, C. A., Muller, L. M., & Kaniskan, R. B. (2011). The effects of differentiated instruction and enrichment pedagogy on reading achievement in five elementary schools. American Educational Study Journal, 48(2), 462–501. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831210382891.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Sedova, K., Salamounova, Z., & Svaricek, R. (2014). Troubles with dialogic teaching. Learning, culture and social interaction, 3(4), 274-285.
Semrádová, M. (2022). Improving the education process by introducing individualization and difference in pupils of the 1st primary school. Slavonic Pedagogical Studies Journal, 11(1), 154–178. https://doi.org/10.18355/PG.2022.11.1.11
Semrádová, M. (2023). The phenomenon of learning task differentiation as a way to support all learners in primary education. Slavonic Pedagogical Studies Journal, 12(1), 14–30.
Sindelarová, B. (2016). P?edcházíme poruchám u?ení. Portál.
Slavik, C. E., Kalenge, S., & Demers, P. A. (2018). Recent trends in the industrial use and emission of known and suspected carcinogens in Ontario, Canada. Reviews on Environmental Health, 33(1), 99-107.
Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant observation. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1999). Základy kvalitativního výzkumu: Postupy a techniky metody zakotvené teorie. Sdružení Podané ruce.
Štech, S. (2021). Výzkum, experti a politici – podivuhodný život ideje inkluzivního vzd?lávání v ?R. Pedagogika, 71(3), 403–420. https://doi.org/10.14712/23362189.2021.981
Šva?í?ek, R., & Še?ová, K. (2007). Kvalitativní výzkum v pedagogických v?dách. Portál.
Tomková, A., & Hejlová, H. (2018). Pedagogické procesy v podmínkách spole?ného vzd?lávání a jejich výzkum. Slavonic Pedagogic Studies Journal, 7(2), 247–268. https://doi.org/10.18355/PG.2018.7.2.14.
Tomlinson, C. A. (1999). Mapping a route toward differentiated instruction. Educational leadership, 57, 12-17.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2016). Why differentiation is difficult: Reflections from years in the trenches. Australian Educational Leader, 38(3), 6–8. https://doi.org/10.3316/ielapa.406886637590910
Tomlinson, C. A. (2017). How to Differentiate Instruction in Academically Diverse Classrooms. (3rd ed). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).
Tomlinson, C. A. (2022). Differentiated instruction. In Z. Deng & S. Gopinathan (eds.), The Palgrave handbook of educational thinkers (pp. 1–14). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81037-5_193-1
Tomlinson, C. A. (2022). Everybody's classroom: Differentiating for the shared and unique needs of diverse students. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Tomlinson, C. A., & Imbeau, M. B. (2023). Leading and managing a differentiated classroom (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Tomlinson, C. A., & Strickland, C. A. (2005). Differentiation in practice: A resource guide for differentiating curriculum, grades 9-12. ASCD.
Vygotskij, L. S. (1976). Vývoj vyšších psychických funkcí. SPN
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 Monika Semradova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All articles published by GAERPSY Publishing are under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, allowing author (s) to share copies and redistribute the material in any medium or format. The GAERPSY Publishing cannot revoke these freedoms if they follow the license terms:
• Attribution: Author (s) must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. Author (s) may do so reasonably but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses his/her or thier use.
• NonCommercial: Author (s) may not use the material for commercial purposes.
• NoDerivatives: If author (s) remixes, transforms, or builds upon the material, he/she (they) may not distribute the modified material.
• No additional restrictions: Author (s) may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.