Applied Research Projects as Work-Integrated Learning in Zimbabwean Teacher Education: A Conceptual Analysis

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38140/obp5-2026-08

Keywords:

Applied research projects, generative artificial intelligence, work-integrated learning, experiential learning

Abstract

Worldwide, work-integrated learning (WIL) is a central component of teacher education. This is traditionally facilitated through teaching practice, which allows student teachers to apply theoretical knowledge in authentic classroom contexts. In the Zimbabwean context, universities often complement teaching practice by assigning students to individual supervised research projects at the undergraduate level. The aim is to synthesise existing knowledge to develop new conceptual insights and critically examine how applied research projects, as a form of WIL, can be effectively and ethically integrated into contemporary teacher education. This chapter employs a qualitative desk-based research design to explore applied research projects as a form of WIL in in-service teacher education within Zimbabwean universities. Drawing on the principles of experiential learning theory (ELT), the analysis argues that applied research projects provide meaningful work-integrated learning experiences by actively engaging student teachers and have the potential to enhance teacher preparation. However, the evolving integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) into higher education introduces several new pedagogical and ethical challenges for applied research as WIL. While GAI tools can support the research processes, their misuse may lead to academic dishonesty, including the presentation of fabricated problems or findings, thereby undermining the development of professional and problem-solving skills. This situation underscores the necessity for clear institutional guidelines to promote authentic learning. The chapter contributes to ongoing debates regarding the strengthening of WIL in teacher education.

References

Almpanis, T., Conroy, D., & Joseph-Richard, P. (2025). Practical implications of generativeAI on assessment: Snapshot of early reactions to assessment redesign in an HRM and a psychology course. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 23(3), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.23.3.3971

Al-Thani, N. J., & Ahmad, Z. (2025). Teaching research to teachers—Traversing from

research-oriented education to research learning theory. In Teaching and learning with research cognitive theory (pp. 97–112). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-87544-1_6

Association for Experiential Education. (n.d.). What is experiential education? https://www.aee.org/what-is-experiential-education

Bala, K., & Colvin, A. (2023, July 18). Generative artificial intelligence for education and pedagogy (Committee report). Cornell University, Center for Teaching Innovation. https://teaching.cornell.edu/sites/default/files/2023-08/Cornell-GenerativeAIForEducation-Report_2.pdf

Bertram, C., & Rusznyak, L. (2018). Theorising knowledge for teacher education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315199963

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2025). A systematic review of the impact of teacher professional development on digital instructional integration and teaching practices. Frontiers in Education, 10, Article 1541031. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1541031

Dika, S. L., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., & Privitera, G. J. (2025). Research methods for education (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Ferns, S., Rowe, A. D., & Zegwaard, K. E. (Eds.). (2021). Advances in research, theory and practice in work-integrated learning: Enhancing employability for a sustainable future. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003080080

Fodouop, A. W., Kouam, A., & Muchowe, R. M. (2025). Assessing the role of AI technology in mitigating the equity gap in educational access in Zimbabwe: Barriers and implications. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 8(1). http://journals.sfu.ca/jalt/index.php/jalt

Fütterer, F., & Runge, C. (2025). Rethinking professional development: Development and evaluation of an evidence-based online PD course on the effective use of technology in the classroom. Education Sciences, 15(2), Article 205. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020205

Gravino, C., Iannella, A., Marras, M., Pagliara, S. M., & Palomba, F. (2024). Teachers interacting with generative artificial intelligence: A dual responsibility. In S. Di Martino et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ital-IA 2024 thematic workshops (pp. 83–88). CEUR-WS. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3762/579.pdf

Green, P., Kolb, A. Y., Kolb, D. A., & Kuh, G. (2024). Defining experiential education: The field's seminal thinkers take stock and look ahead. Experiential Learning & Teaching in Higher Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.46787/elthe.v7i1.4010

Griffiths, V., & Tann, S. (2019). Teacher education and the problem of theory and practice. Journal of Education for Teaching, 45(3), 231–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2019.1619517

International Development Research Centre. (2024). Teacher professional development: A research synthesis. IDRC.

Jackson, D., & Bridgstock, R. (2021). What actually works to enhance graduate employability? Teaching in Higher Education, 26(5), 606–620. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1576161

Johari, N. S. B., Saad, N., & Kasim, M. (2022). Teacher collaboration and its influence on teachers' self-efficacy among secondary school teachers. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 11(4), 1873–1880.

Kahn, P., Carrigan, M., Smith, P., Murtagh, L., Liu, R., & Song, F. (2025). Teacher agency and generative artificial intelligence: Teaching in higher education as a responsive, cultural activity. Learning, Media and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2025.2575993

Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (2nd ed.). Pearson.

Kumar, R. (2021). Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners (5th ed.). Pearson.

Kumar, T., Kait, R., Ankita, & Malik, A. (2024). The role of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) in education. In B. Shukla et al. (Eds.), Intelligent IT solutions for sustainability in Industry 5.0 paradigm (Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, Vol. 1185, pp. 195–207). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-1682-1_17

Matarazzo, M., Caldelli, R., Martini, B., & Sciarrone, F. (2025). The impact of artificial intelligence and generative AI in education: A review of the post-ChatGPT era. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Technology, Innovation and Industrial Management for Sustainable Development (pp. 439–445). ToKnowPress.

Matsa, W., & Chikunda, P. (2024). Revisiting teaching practice assessment in teacher education. Journal of Research Innovation and Implications in Education, 8(3), 279–293. https://doi.org/10.59765/sipiw4956

Mesuwini, J., Thaba-Nkadimene, K. L., Mzindle, D., & Mokoena, S. (2023). Work-integrated learning experiences of South African TVET lecturers. International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, 24(1), 83–97.

Ministry of Primary and Secondary Education. (2015). Curriculum framework for primary and secondary education 2015–2022. Government of Zimbabwe.

Mtetwa, D. K. (2014). Continuous professional development of teachers: A case of Zimbabwe. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 4(4), 267–275.

Mukeredzi, T. G., & Manwa, L. (2019). Inside mentor–mentee meetings in pre-service teacher school-based teaching practice in Zimbabwe. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 44(7), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2019v44n7.3

Mukwerete, K., & Chikusvura-Matiza, N. (2025). Integration of artificial intelligence by tertiary education students in Zimbabwe. Randwick International of Education and Linguistics Science Journal, 6(1), 153–162. https://doi.org/10.47175/rielsj.v6i1.1143

Mutambara, T. E. (2023). Service learning in teacher education programmes: A literature review. International Journal of Higher Education Management, 9(2), 63–78.

Nikolopoulou, K. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence and sustainable higher education: Mapping the potential. Journal of Digital Educational Technology, 5(1), ep2506. https://doi.org/10.30935/jdet/15860

Open Innovation Team, & Department for Education. (2024). Generative AI in education: Educator and expert views. UK Government. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/generative-ai-in-education-educator-and-expert-views

Osunbunmi, I. S., Cutler, S. L., Dansu, V., Brijmohan, Y., Bamidele, B. R., Udosen, A. N., Arinze, L. C., Oje, A. V., Moyaki, D., Hicks, M. J., & Shih, B. P. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence-assisted learning. In Proceedings of the 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--47041

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Self-determination theory and autonomy support in education. Frontiers in Education. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2020.00107/full

Sachs, J., Rowe, A., & Wilson, M. (2017). Good practice report: Work-integrated learning (WIL). Department of Education and Training. https://ltr.edu.au/resources/WIL_Report.pdf

Stirling, A., Kerr, G., Banwell, J., MacPherson, E., & Heron, A. (2016). A practical guide for work-integrated learning. Higher Education Council of Ontario.

Tsafos, V. (2025). Developing inquiry and reflection skills through action research in teacher education. Journal of Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 47–60.

Universities Australia. (2019). Work integrated learning in universities: Final report. https://universitiesaustralia.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/WIL-in-universities-final-report-April-2019.pdf

Published

2026-06-09