Assessment of Learners with Mild to Moderate Intellectual Disabilities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38140/obp2-2024-06Keywords:
Mild to moderate intellectual disability, conventional assessment, high-stakes examination, accommodations, mainstream schoolsAbstract
It is common practice to provide accommodations for learners who demonstrate mild to moderate intellectual disability (MID) in conventional assessments, including high-stakes examinations. Examples of these accommodations include extra time, readers and scribes, test formats and responses, and assistive devices. One concern is that even with these adjustments, academic success remains limited, as they do not address the cognitive load of the task. This study investigated the difficulties faced by learners with MID and how these challenges affect assessment practices. It followed a qualitative approach, using an online survey to collect qualitative data from 30 schools. Additionally, principals from six schools participated in semi-structured interviews. The data was analysed thematically. The findings indicate that learners with MID have limited cognitive abilities and, therefore, experience difficulties in processing and remembering large amounts of information at once. They also have limited executive functions, poor academic attitudes, and short attention spans. Regarding current assessment practices, the findings reveal that all formal tests consist primarily of various short-answer question formats; all summative assessments are brief and are sometimes administered once per semester, while practical assessments are given a higher weight than theoretical assessments. This study has uncovered that the use of conventional accommodations does not adequately provide learners with MID the opportunity to demonstrate their knowledge and competencies. It recommends that education policies be amended to address the current assessment challenges in order to encourage academic success for learners with MID.
References
Asiamah, N., Mensah, H., & Oteng-Abayie, E. F. (2017). General, target, and accessible population: Demystifying the concepts for effective sampling. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2017.2674
Asma, H., & Dallel, S. (2020). Cognitive load theory and its relation to instructional design: Perspectives of some Algerian university teachers of English. Arab World English Journal, 11(4), 110–127. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no4.8
Bhati, L., & Sharma, H. (2023). Working memory and activities of daily living among children with intellectual disability. Journal of Namibian Studies: History Politics Culture, 35, 1342-1350.
Bouck, E. C., & Long, H. (2021). Traditional and Innovative Assessment Techniques for Students with Intellectual Disabilities. In Advances in special education (pp. 59–74). https://doi.org/10.1108/s0270-401320210000036004
Camedda, D., Banks, J., & Ringwood, B. (2024). Empowering Diversity: A Case Study on Inclusive Assessment and Universal Design for Learning in a Post-secondary Programme for Students with Intellectual Disabilities. All Ireland Journal of Higher Education, 16(2), 1-12.
Cockcroft, K. (2015). The role of working memory in childhood education: Five questions and answers. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 5(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajce.v5i1.347
Creswell J. W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach. Sage publications.
Dawadi, S. (2020). Thematic Analysis Approach: A step-by-step guide for ELT research practitioners. Journal of NELTA, 25(1–2), 62–71. https://doi.org/10.3126/nelta.v25i1-2.49731
Department of Basic Education (DBE). (2015). Policy on screening, identification, assessment, and support. Pretoria: Government printers.
Department of Education (DoE). (2001). Education White Paper 6. Special needs education: Building an inclusive education and training system. Pretoria: Government Printers.
Department of Education (DoE). (2012). National Protocol for assessments. Pretoria: Government Printers.
Fuchs, L. S., Seethaler, P. M., Sterba, S. K., Craddock, C., Fuchs, D., Compton, D. L., Geary, D. C., & Changas, P. (2020). Closing the word-problem achievement gap in first grade: Schema-based word-problem intervention with embedded language comprehension instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(1), 86–103. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000467
Geary, D. C., Hoard, M. K., Nugent, L., Ünal, Z. E., & Scofield, J. E. (2020). Comorbid Learning Difficulties in Reading and Mathematics: The role of intelligence and In-Class Attentive Behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.572099
Guez, A., Ketan, & Piacentini, M. (2024). Mapping study for the integration of accommodations for students with Special Education Needs (SEN) in PISA. In OECD Education Working Papers. https://doi.org/10.1787/ed03c717-en
ADCET. (n.d.). Inclusive teaching: Intellectual disability. https://www.adcet.edu.au/inclusive-teaching/specific-disabilities/intellectual-disability
Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2019). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. Sage publications.
Kalyanpur, M. (2020). Disrupting the narrative of universality of inclusive education: The new marginalization of Low-Income, English Language Learners in India. The Educational Forum, 84(4), 296–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2020.1796071
Kamran, M., Siddiqui, S., & Adil, M. S. (2023). Breaking Barriers: The Influence of Teachers’ Attitudes on Inclusive Education for Students with Mild Learning Disabilities (MLDs). Education Sciences, 13(6), 606. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13060606
Kamran, M., Siddiqui, S., & Adil, M. S. (2023b). Breaking Barriers: The Influence of Teachers’ Attitudes on Inclusive Education for Students with Mild Learning Disabilities (MLDs). Education Sciences, 13(6), 606. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13060606
Keskinova, A., & Ajdinski, G. (2018). Learning problems in children with mild intellectual disability. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science Engineering and Education, 6(1), 31–37. https://doi.org/10.5937/ijcrsee1801031k
Lin, P. Y. (2021). Teachers Differentiated Assessment Practices for Secondary Students with Exceptionalities: The More, the Better? Journal of Disability Studies, 7(2), 64-74.
Miranti, S. A. (2024). Analysis of written language difficulties in asynchronous gifted children in the lower grades.
Mpu, Y., & Adu, E. O. (2021). The challenges of inclusive education and its 0implementation in schools: The South African perspective. Perspectives in Education, 39(2), 225-238.
Mujere, N. (2016). Sampling in research. In Mixed methods research for improved scientific study (pp. 107-121). IGI Global.
Mulisa, F. (2022). When Does a Researcher Choose a Quantitative, Qualitative, or Mixed Research Approach?. Interchange, 53(1), 113-131.
Mustafa, W. (2023). A proposed conception of the requirements for improving the effectiveness of innovative assessment techniques for students with mental disabilities and autism spectrum disorders in the light of the skills of the twenty-first century" a field study in Sohag Governorate. Journal of Research in Education and Psychology, 38(4), 185-288.
Noman, M., & Kaur, A. (2020). Differentiated Assessment A New Paradigm in Assessment Practices for Diverse Learners. International Journal of Education and Cognitive Sciences, 1(3), 1-7.
Paas, F., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2020). Cognitive-Load Theory: Methods to manage working memory load in the learning of complex tasks. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(4), 394–398. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721420922183
Paradis, E., O’Brien, B., Nimmon, L., Bandiera, G., & Martimianakis, M. A. (2016). Design: Selection of data collection methods. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 8(2), 263–264. https://doi.org/10.4300/jgme-d-16-00098.1
Patel, D., & Alismail, A. (2024). Relationship between Cognitive Load Theory, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotions in Healthcare Professions Education: A Perspective on the missing link. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, Volume 15, 57–62. https://doi.org/10.2147/amep.s441405
Peng, P., & Kievit, R. A. (2020). The Development of Academic Achievement and Cognitive Abilities: a Bidirectional perspective. Child Development Perspectives, 14(1), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12352
Richmond-Rakerd, L. S., D’Souza, S., Andersen, S. H., Hogan, S., Houts, R. M., Poulton, R., Ramrakha, S., Caspi, A., Milne, B. J., & Moffitt, T. E. (2020). Clustering of health, crime, and social-welfare inequality in 4 million citizens from two nations. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(3), 255–264. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0810-4
Schnotz, W., & Kürschner, C. (2007). A reconsideration of cognitive load theory. Educational Psychology Review, 19(4), 469–508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9053-4
Stratton, S. J. (2021). Population Research: Convenience sampling strategies. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 36(4), 373–374. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049023x21000649
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
Taherdoost, H. (2022). What are Different Research Approaches? Comprehensive Review of Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Research, Their Applications, Types, and Limitations. Journal of Management Science & Engineering Research, 5(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.30564/jmser.v5i1.4538
Theron, P. M. (2015). Coding and data analysis during qualitative empirical research in Practical Theology. In Die Skriflig/in Luce Verbi, 49(3). https://doi.org/10.4102/ids.v49i3.1880
Tümen-Aky?ld?z, S., & Ahmed, K.H. (2021). An overview of qualitative research and focus group discussion. Journal of Academic Research in Education, 7(1), 1-15. DOI: 10.17985/ijare.866762
Ugwu, C. I., Ekere, J. N., & Onoh, C. (2021). Research paradigms and methodological choices in the research process. Journal of Applied Information Science and Technology, 14(2), 116-124.
El Wafa, H. E. a. E., Ghobashy, S. a. E. L., & Hamza, A. M. (2020). A comparative study of executive functions among children with attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder and those with learning disabilities. Middle East Current Psychiatry, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43045-020-00071-8
Xu, K. M., Koorn, P., De Koning, B., Skuballa, I. T., Lin, L., Henderikx, M., Marsh, H. W., Sweller, J., & Paas, F. (2020). A growth mindset lowers perceived cognitive load and improves learning: Integrating motivation to cognitive load. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(6), 1177–1191. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000631
Zaqueu, L., Teixeira, M. C. T. V., Lowenthal, R., Mari, J. J., Miguel, E. C., Rohde, L. A., & Paula, C. S. (2021). Disability in children and adolescents: the extent of the impact on psychiatric disorders and educational deficits. Trends in psychiatry and psychotherapy, 43(3), 235-239.
Kuhnert, A. (2003). Exploring the assessment process in an inclusive classroom: A case study [MEd Thesis, Stellenbosch University]. https://scholar.sun.ac.za/items/f61d17ce-a4e1-4ddc-9e6e-da7034235403
Themane, M., & Thobejane, H. R. (2018). Teachers as change agents in making teaching inclusive in some selected rural schools of Limpopo Province, South Africa: implications for teacher education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 23(4), 369–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1434690
Chauke, M., & Tabane, R. (2024). Educators’ adaptive assessment procedures in teaching English First Additional Language in Grade 6 inclusive classrooms in South Africa. South African Journal of Education, 44(3), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v44n3a2461
Published
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 Matsobane Elaine Johnstone
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
