Equipping pre-service mathematics teachers for diverse classrooms: Best practices and innovations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38140/obp3-2025-09Keywords:
Cultural competence, diversity in education, inclusive pedagogy, mathematics teacher preparation, teacher training innovationsAbstract
This chapter explores innovative approaches and best practices in preparing mathematics teachers for diverse classrooms by employing four key theoretical frameworks: Culturally Relevant Pedagogy, Culturally Responsive Teaching, Differentiated Instruction, and Universal Design for Learning. These frameworks serve as guiding principles for equipping pre-service educators to effectively address the diverse cultural, academic, and learning needs in today’s classrooms. The study employed a comprehensive review of literature, focusing on empirical studies and practical implementations of these inclusive pedagogies in mathematics education. The analysis examined how teacher preparation programmes integrate these frameworks into their curricula to foster equity, inclusivity, and academic excellence. The chapter also discusses challenges encountered in the implementation of inclusive pedagogies, such as resistance to pedagogical shifts and limitations in teacher training programmes. To address these challenges, recommendations are provided for enhancing teacher preparation, including the incorporation of cultural competence training, differentiated instructional strategies, and universally designed learning environments. The findings suggest that these pedagogical frameworks, when implemented effectively, lead to improved student engagement, achievement, and a greater sense of belonging among learners from diverse backgrounds. By aligning teacher preparation programmes with CRP, CRT, DI, and UDL, this chapter emphasises the need for mathematics educators to adopt flexible, responsive teaching practices that cater to the needs of all students, ultimately fostering a more equitable learning environment in diverse classrooms.
References
Almeqdad, Q. I., Alodat, A. M., Alquraan, M. F., Mohaidat, M. A., & Al-Makhzoomy, A. K. (2023). The effectiveness of universal design for learning: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Cogent Education, 10(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2218191
Anyichie, A. C. (2024). Engaging preservice teachers with culturally relevant microteaching activity: A university professor's experience and perception. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 6(3), 125-137. https://doi.org/10.33902/jpsp.202429217
Bal, A. P. (2016). The effect of the differentiated teaching approach in the algebraic learning field on students’ academic achievements. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 63, 185–204. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2016.63.11
Bal, A. P. (2023). Assessing the impact of differentiated instruction on mathematics achievement and attitudes of secondary school learners. South African Journal of Education, 43(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v43n1a2065
Byrd, C. M. (2016). Does culturally relevant teaching work? An examination from student perspectives. SAGE Open, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016660744
Centre for Applied Special Technology. (2008). Universal design for learning guidelines version 1.0. Centre for Applied Special Technology.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Reagan, E. M. (2021). “Best practices” for evaluating teacher preparation programs. National Academy of Education Committee on Evaluating and Improving Teacher Preparation Programs.
Eden, C. A., Chisom, O. N., & Adeniyi, I. S. (2024). Cultural competence in education: Strategies for fostering inclusivity and diversity awareness. International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences, 6(3), 383–392. https://doi.org/10.51594/ijarss.v6i3.895
Faragher, R., Hill, J., & Clarke, B. (2016). Inclusive practices in mathematics education. In Research in mathematics education in Australasia 2012–2015 (pp. 109–131). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1419-2_7
FitzGerald, C., Martin, A., Berner, D., & et al. (2019). Interventions designed to reduce implicit prejudices and implicit stereotypes in real-world contexts: A systematic review. BMC Psychology, 7, 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-019-0299-7
Gay, G. (2022). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.
Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
Iwuanyanwu, P. N. (2023). Preparing teachers for culturally responsive education. Indilinga African Journal of Indigenous Knowledge Systems, 22(1), 13. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/ejc-linga_v22_n1_a2
Kamarulzaman, M. H., Kamarudin, M. F., Sharif, M. S. A. M., Esrati, M. Z., Saali, M. M. S. N., & Yusof, R. (2022). Impact of differentiated instruction on the mathematical thinking processes of gifted and talented students. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 9(4), 269–277. https://doi.org/10.20448/jeelr.v9i4.4253
Karatas, K. (2020). The competencies of the culturally responsive teacher: What, why, and how? i.e.: Inquiry in Education, 12(2), Article 2. https://digitalcommons.nl.edu/ie/vol12/iss2/2
Kusumaha, I. P., & Ani, Y. (2021). Universal design learning approach to overcome mathematics learning. Global Conferences Series: Social Sciences, Education and Humanities (GCSSSEH), 8, 33–39. https://doi.org/10.32698/GCS-11513
Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032003465
Mahlambi, S. B. (2023). Mathematics teachers' use of assessment for learning to promote classroom diversity of learners. Pythagoras, 44(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v44i1.708
Mamedova, S., & Orosco, M. J. (2024). Culturally responsive mathematics: Characteristics in classroom settings. In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Disability (pp. 1–9). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40858-8
Mbhiza, H., Nkambule, T., & Masinire, A. (2024). Student teachers’ mentorship experiences during teaching practice: A comparison of mentor-student dynamics in rural and urban schools. Interdisciplinary Journal of Education Research, 6, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.38140/ijer-2024.vol6.05
Mburu, J. M. (2022). “All children matter”: A preservice teacher’s understanding and practice of culturally responsive teaching in a third-grade mathematics classroom. International Journal of Multicultural Education, 24(1), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.18251/ijme.v24i1.2623
Meyer, A., Rose, D. H., & Gordon, D. (2014). Universal design for learning: Theory and practice. CAST Professional Publishing.
Mi?anovi?, V., Vu?kovi?, D., Maslovari?, B., Šakoti?, N., & Novovi?, T. (2023). Effects and challenges to implement differentiated mathematics teaching among fourth graders in Montenegro. South African Journal of Education, 43(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v43n3a2100
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Research Methods and Reporting, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535
Nurasiah, L., Priatna, B. A., & Priatna, N. (2020). The effect of differentiated instruction on student mathematical communication ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1469, 012160. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1469/1/012160
Olawale, B. (2024). Collaborative virtual environments (CVEs) in the preparation of pre-service mathematics teachers. Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age, 9(2), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.53850/joltida.1359772
Olawale, B. E. (2022). Democratic citizenship in mathematics teacher preparation in South African universities: Contradictions in theory and practice. International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education, 6(2), 126-139. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijpte.v6i2.61574
Olawale, B. E. (2024). Impact of pre-service teacher education programme on mathematics student teachers’ teaching practices during school experiences. Education Sciences, 14(7), 762. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14070762
Olawale, B. E., & Hendricks, W. (2024, December). Artificial intelligence in teacher education: Unlocking the tools and benefits of a transforming pedagogy. Paper presented at 21st Century Pedagogies for Sustainable Development in Education Conference, Liverpool Hope University, Liverpool, UK.
Prast, E. J., Van de Weijer-Bergsma, E., Kroesbergen, E. H., & Van Luit, J. E. H. (2018). Differentiated instruction in primary mathematics: Effects of teacher professional development on student achievement. Learning and Instruction, 54, 22–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.01.009
Root, J. R., Cox, S. K., Saunders, A., & Gilley, D. (2020). Applying the universal design for learning framework to mathematics instruction for learners with extensive support needs. Remedial and Special Education, 41(4), 194–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932519887235
Sanger, C. S. (2020). Inclusive pedagogy and universal design approaches for diverse learning environments. In C. Sanger & N. Gleason (Eds.), Diversity and inclusion in global higher education (pp. 55-71). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1628-3_2
Shultz, M., Close, E., Nissen, J., & Van Dusen, B. (2024). Enacting culturally relevant pedagogy when “mathematics has no color”: Epistemological contradictions. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 10(2), 486–515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-023-00219-x
Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms (2nd ed.). ASCD.
Weiss, S., Braun, A., Pacher, M., Schlegel, C. M., & Kiel, E. (2024). Adapting feedback to the demands of teaching in diverse classrooms: Novel feedback concepts for preservice teachers during practicum. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 49(3), 285–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2024.2338846
Published
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2025 Felix Egara, Moeketsi Mosia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
