Potential threats to implementing instructional leadership in Western Cape township secondary schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38140/ijer-2024.vol6.33Keywords:
Instructional leadership, learner achievement, critical emancipatory research, participatory action research, external interferenceAbstract
This empirical study examines the factors that pose challenges to the implementation of instructional leadership in township secondary schools in the Western Cape province of South Africa. The study adopts Critical Emancipatory Research (CER), which promotes peace, hope, freedom, and social justice, as its theoretical framework. Participatory action research (PAR), utilising focus group interviews, is employed to collect data. PAR is situated within a transformative paradigm, and a qualitative research approach is chosen to align with this paradigm. Data is collected through focus group discussions with the school management team (SMT), consisting of the principal, two deputy principals, and six heads of department. These discussions aim to gather information on threats to instructional leadership and strategies to mitigate these threats. The findings reveal that the local community and its dynamics, along with the prevalence of violence in the neighbourhood, are external factors that significantly impede the smooth operation of the school and negatively affect the implementation of effective instructional leadership. Conversely, factors such as limited interference from the local community, reduced workload, adherence to compliance guidelines and requirements set by the Department of Education, and an unimpeded leadership role for the management team may contribute to the successful implementation of instructional leadership. Therefore, the study recommends promoting effective and transparent communication as well as open engagement among all stakeholders within the school.
References
Anderson, J. R., Hughes, J. L., & Trivedi, M. H. (2020). School personnel and parents’ concerns related to COVID-19 pandemic’s impact related to schools. School Psychology Review, 50(4), 519-529. https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966x.2020.1862626
Botha, R. J. (2020). Enkele kontekstuele invloede op skoolhoofde:’n studie in Gautengse skole. Litnet Akademies, 17(1), 490-510. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC-1d8dd08848
Burger, E. Chionh, N., & Miko, A. (2022). School leaders’ experiences on dealing with students exposed to domestic violence. Journal of Family Violence, 37, 1089-1100. https://doi.org/10.1027/s10896-021-00310-4
Carey, M. A., & Asbury, J. E. (2016). Focus groups research (Vol. 9). Routledge.
Chance, N.L. (2021). Resilient Leadership: A phenomenological exploration into how black women in higher education leadership navigate cultural adversity. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 62(1), 44-78. https://doi.org/101177/00221678211003000
Cram, F., & Mertens, D. M. (2016). Negotiating solidarity between indigenous transformative paradigms in evaluation. New Zealand Council for Educational Research, 101-189. http://dx.doi.org/10.18296/em.0015
Danielsen, H. & Bendixsen, S. (2019). Dealing with diversity, hoping for inclusion. Parents’ involvement in urban schools in Norway. Ethnicities, 19(6), 1158-1180. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796818522542
Diekmann, K. (2022). Nevertheless, she persisted: Feminist women overcoming career adversity through communities of support. Journal of employment counselling, 59(4), 189-204. https://doi.org/10.1002/joec.12190
Dieronitou, I. (2014). The ontological and epistemological foundations of qualitative approaches to research with particular reference to content and discourse analysis of textbooks. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 2(10), 1-17.
Dube, B. & Hlalele, D. (2018). Revisiting critical emancipatory research in school violence narratives. A quest for a safe school. Educational Research for Social Change, 8(4), 74-86.
Eruera, M. (2010). Ma Te Wh?nau Te Huarahi Motuhake: Wh?nau participatory action research groups. MAI Review 3, 1–9.
Grissom, J. & Condon, L. (2021). Leading schools and districts in times of crisis. Educational Researcher, 50(5), 315-324. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x211023112
Haller, J., & Novita, S. (2021). Parents’ perceptions of school support during COVID-19: What satisfies parents? Sec. Educational Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.700441
Hlalele, D. (2013). Introducing participatory rural appraisal methodologies to rural education research. In Conference Proceedings (pp. 23-26). Bergen, Norway.
Holmes, B., Parker, D., & Gibson, J. (2019). Rethinking teacher retention in hard-to-staff schools. Education Doctorate Faculty Works, 3. https://openriver.winona.edu/educationeddfucultyworks/3
Hung, M., Licari, F. W., & Almpani, K. (2024). Focus group interviews as part of a clinical research immersion experience MedEdPublish, 14(22), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.12688/mep.19913.1
Hurtado, S. (2022). Advancing culturally responsive research and researchers. Routledge.
Jackson, K. M., Pukys, S., Castro, A., Hermasura, L., Mendez, J., Vohra-Gupta, D., Padilla, Y., & Morales, G. (2018). Using the transformative paradigm to conduct a mixed methods needs assessment of a marginalised community: Methodological lessons and implications. Evaluation and Program Planning, 66, 111-119. https://doi.org/10.11.16/j.evalprogplan.2017.09.010
Kanwal, G. M. & Waheed, S. A. (2023). Working under pressure: How are head teachers inhibited and challenged while pursuing the headship in secondary schools? Journal of Arts and Social Sciences, 10(1), 86-98. https://doi.org/10.46662/jass.v10i1.331
Kaufman, J. H., Diliberti, M. K., & Hamilton, L. S. (2022). How principals’ perceived resource needs and job demands are related to their dissatisfaction and intention to leave their schools during the COVID-19 pandemic. Aera Open, 8, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584221081234
Kaul, M., Comstock, M., & Simon, N. S. (2022). Leading from the middle: How principals rely on district guidance and organisational conditions in times of crisis. Aera Open, 8, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.117723328584221077303
Kilag, O. K. T., Abendan, C. F. K., Uy, F. T., Calledo, M. F. S., Diano Jr, F. M., & Morales Jr, N. M. (2023). Assessing the impact of principal’s instructional leadership, school level, and effectiveness in educational institutions. Science and Education, 4(5), 902-917.
Kilag, O. K. T., & Sasan, J. M. (2023). Unpacking the role of instructional leadership in teacher professional development. Advanced Qualitative Research, 1(1), 63-73. https://doi.org/10.31098/aqr.v1i1.1380
Mahlomaholo, M. G. (2009). Critical emancipatory research and academic identity. Africa Education Review, 6(2), 224-237. https://doi.org/10.1080/18146620903274555
Mantler, T., Shillington, K.J., Yates, J., Tryphonopoulos, P., Jackson, K.T., & Ford-Giboe, M. (2024). Resilience is more than Nature: An Exploration of the Conditions that Nature Resilience Among Rural Women who have Experienced IPV. Journal of Family Violence, 39, 165-175.
McMahon, S.D., Bare, K.M., Cafaro, C.L., Zinter, K.E. Garcia-Murillo, Y., Lynch, G., McMahon, K.M., Espelage, D.L., Reddy, L.A. Anderman, E.M., & Subotnik, R. (2023). Understanding parent aggression directed against teachers: A school climate framework, Learning Environ Res, 26, 915-931. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-023-09460-2
Merriam, S. B., & Grenier, R. S. (Eds). 2019. Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
Mertens, D. (2007). Transformative paradigm: Mixed methods and social justice. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(3), 212-225. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689807302811
Mertens, D., Fraser, J., & Heimlich, J. (2008). M or F?: Gender, identity, and the transformative research paradigm. Museums & Social Issues, 3(1), 81-92. https://doi.org/10.1179/msi.2008.3.1.81
Mogashoa, T. (2014). Understanding critical discourse analysis in qualitative research. International Journal of Humanities, Social Sciences and Education, 1(7), 104-113.
Nassaji, H. (2020). Good qualitative research. Language Teaching Research, 24(4), 427-431. https://10.1177/1362168820941288
Ndaba, X. & Dube, B. (2021). Critical emancipatory research approach to enhance performance among progressed learners in life sciences. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 12(4), 53-65. https://doi.org/10.36941/mjss-2021-0027
Noel, L. (2016). Promoting an emancipatory research paradigm in design education and practice. In Proceedings of the Design Research Society Conference (pp. 1-16). https://dl.designresearchsociety.org/drs-conference-papers/drs2016/researchpapers/157/
Omodan, B. I. (2022). Transformative research in context: An argument of relevant methods. Paper presented at the South Africa International Conference on Education, Pretoria, 26-28 October 2022.
Puri, G. (2023). Participatory Action Research in Social Sciences and Education. Journal of NELTA Gandaki,vi(1&2), 66-77. https://doi.org/10.3126/long.v6i1-2.59713
Rahimi, F., & Riasati, M. J. (2011). Critical Discourse analysis: Scrutinising ideologically driven discourses. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(46), 107-112.
Ramos-Salamanca, L., Zax, A., & Gudino, O. G. (2021). Exposure to violence, coping, academic achievement in latinx adolescents. School Mental Health 14, 598-607.
Rodela, K. Rodriguez-Mojica, C., & Cochrun, A. (2019). ‘You guys are bilingual, aren’t you?’ Latinx educational leadership pathways in the New Latinx Diaspora. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 24(1), 84-107. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2019.1566577
Romm, N. R. (2015). Reviewing the transformative paradigm: A critical systemic and relational (Indigenous) lens. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 28, 411-427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-015-9344-5
Romm, N. R. (2014). Exploration of transformative paradigm with pragmatic twist to contribute to educational change. International Journal on New Trends in Education and their implications, 5(2), 134-144.
Sendall, M. C., McCosker, L. K., Brodie, A., Hill, M., & Crane, P. (2018). Participatory action research, mixed methods, and research teams: learning from philosophically juxtaposed methodologies for optimal research outcomes. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0636-1
Stelmach, B., Smith, L., & O’Connor, B. (2021). Moral distress among school leaders: An Alberta, Canada study with global implications. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 27(4), 834-856. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2021.1926545
Tomaszewski, L. E., Zarestky, J., & Gonzalez, E. (2020). Planning qualitative research: Design and decision making for new researchers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920967174
Tsotetsi, C. T. (2013). The implementation of professional teacher development policies: A continuing education perspective [Doctoral dissertation, University of the Free State]. http://hdl.handle.net/11660/1725
Ulfatin, N., Mustiningsih, Sumarsono, R. B., & Yunus, J. N. (2022). School-based management in marginal areas: Satisfying the political context and student needs. Management in Education, 36(3), 124-134. https://doi.org/10.1177/08920620959739
Wallerstein, N., Duran, B., Oetzel, J. G., & Minkler, M. (Eds.). (2017). Community-based participatory research for health: Advancing social and health equity. John Wiley & Sons.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 Jerry George Mofoka , Matsolo Mokhampanyane
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
