Minimal change in achievement in high-stakes mathematics examinations in low socio-economic status environments in post-apartheid South Africa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38140/ijss-2024.vol4.s1.05Keywords:
Post-apartheid mathematics, high stakes examinations, teacher professional development, productive practiceAbstract
Since various curriculum versions have been implemented in the post-apartheid era, achievement results in high-stakes mathematics examinations are still structured along socio-economic status lines. Continuing professional development (CPD) for mathematics teachers is widely viewed as a mechanism to address this issue. This study uses a specific CPD project to explore the question, “Are three decades-long enough to enhance achievement outcomes in high-stakes mathematics examinations for learners from low socio-economic status environments?” Bricolage is employed as the underlying research framework due to the multifaceted nature of CPD. In one of the residential institutes in 2018, a 7-item questionnaire, based on features of effective CPD and containing four ordinal response categories, was administered to 55 participating teachers (30 females and 25 males). To acknowledge the complex nature of CPD, themes were developed and primarily analysed using descriptive statistics. The analysis revealed that, although mathematics teachers respond favourably to practising previously taught material, there are factors that hinder the sustainability of such an approach. It is concluded that 30 years is not a sufficient timespan to expect significant change. It is recommended that drastic measures be taken regarding the continuing professional development of mathematics teachers to address disparities along class and racial lines.
References
Armstrong, A. (2017). Bricolage in middle years school mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 37(2), 19—24.
Bansilal, S. (2015). A Rasch analysis of a Grade 12 test written by mathematics teachers. South African Journal of Science, 111(5/6), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2015/20140098
Berends, M., Lucas, S. R., Sullivan, T., & Briggs, R. J. (2005). Examining gaps in mathematics achievement among racial-ethnic groups, 1972-1992. Rand Corporation.
Biccard, P. (2018). Primary School Mathematics Teacher Reflection through a Modelling-Based Professional Development Programme. Africa Education Review, 15(2), 49–64, https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2016.1241672
Carey, B. (2013, September 2). Cognitive science meets pre-algebra. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com
Cobb, P., & Jackson, K. (2015). Supporting teachers’ use of research?based instructional
sequences. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47, 1027–1038. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0679-2
Cordingley, P., Bell, M., Rundell, B., & Evans, D. (2003). How does collaborative continuing professional development (CPD) for teachers in the 5-16 age range affect teaching and learning? Centre for the Use of Research and Evidence in Education (CUREE).
Denny, T. (1977). Some still do: River acres, Texas. Case studies in science education (booklet No. 1). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Ebbinghaus, H. (1964). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. Oxford, England: Dover.
Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting mathematics education. Reidel Publishing Company.
Gravemeijer, K. (1994). Educational development and developmental research in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25(5), 443-471.
Gattegno, C. (1987). The science of education part 1: Theoretical considerations. Educational Solutions Worldwide Inc.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
Hoadley, U. (2017). Pedagogy in poverty: Lessons from twenty years of curriculum reform in South Africa. Routledge.
Hugo, W (2020). Book Review Pedagogy in poverty: Lessons from twenty years of curriculum reform in South Africa (2018) by Ursula Hoadley. Journal of Education, 79, 115 – 120, http://journals.ukzn.ac.za/index.php/joe
Jansen, J. (1998). Curriculum reform in South Africa: A critical analysis of outcomes-based education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 28(3), 321–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764980280306
Julie, C. (2019). Assessment of teachers’ mathematical content knowledge through large-scale tests: What are the implications for CPD? In C. Julie, L. Holtman, & C. R. Smith (Eds.), Caught in the act: Reflections on continuing professional development of mathematics teachers in a collaborative partnership (pp. 41–60). African SUN Media.
Julie, C. (2023). Navigating system dynamics modelling software to construct scenarios for continuous professional development. Unpublished paper presented at the 21st International Conference on the Teaching of Mathematical Modelling and Applications, Yokohama National University, Japan.
Kindt, M. (2011). Principles of practice. In P. Drijvers (Ed.), Secondary algebra education: Revisiting topics and themes and exploring the unknown (pp. 137–178). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-435-3
Linacre, J. M. (2006). A user's guide to W I N S T E P S® M I N I S T E P Rasch-model computer programs. Linacre.
Links, L. (2019). Spiral revision being part of my mathematics classroom rhythm / Spiraal hersiening as deel van my klaskamer ritme. In C. R. Smith (Ed.), Welcome to my story: Proceedings of the LEDIMTALI teacher conferences held in the Western Cape and Northern Cape(pp. 32–34). LEDIMTALI.
Ma, L. (2010). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers' understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Routledge.Maass, K., Cobb. P., Krainer, K., & Potari, D. (2019). Different ways to implement innovative teaching approaches at scale. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 102, 303–318 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09920-8
Mason, J., & Davies, J. (1991). Fostering and Sustaining Mathematical Thinking through Problem Solving. Deakin University Press.
Matz, M. (1980). Towards a computational theory of algebraic competence. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 3, 93–166.
Mbhiza, H. W., & Jojo, Z. (2024). Pedagogical and social transformations in post-apartheid mathematics education. Interdisciplinary Journal of Sociality Studies, 4(s1),1–02. https://doi.org/10.38140/ijss-2024.vol4.s1.01
Mosia, M. (2016). Periodisation of mathematics teacher knowledge for teaching: A construction of bricolage. Southern African Review of Education, 22(1), 134–151.
Murray, S. R., & Udermann, B. E. (2003). Massed versus distributed practice: Which is better? CAHPERD Journal, 28(1), 19 – 21
Ntow, F. D., & Adler, J. (2019). Identity resources and mathematics teaching identity: an exploratory study. ZDM, 51, 419–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01025-z
Ratcliffe, R. (2013, October 7). Professional development in teaching: the challenges, solutions and status quo. The Guardian.https://www.theguardian.com
Rich, P., & Tripp, T. (2012). Using video to analyse one's own teaching. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(4), 678-704. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01232.x
Setati, M. (2005). Researching teaching and learning in school from ‘with’ or ‘on’ teachers to ‘with’ and ‘on’ teachers: Conversations. Perspectives in Education, 23(1), 91–101. https://doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v23i1.8
Smith, C.R. (2019). Welcome to my story: Proceedings of the LEDIMTALI teachers’ conference held in the Western Cape and Northern Cape.. LEDIMTALI,
Smith, C. R., Julie, C., Nel, B. P., & Gierdien, F. (2022). Teachers’ preferences regarding continuous professional development: A survey of teachers participating in a continuous professional development initiative. In 30th Annual Conference of the Southern African Association for Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education (pp. 18–20). Southern African Association for Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education.
Taylor, N., & Vinjevold, P. (Eds) (1999). Getting learning right: Report to the President's Education Initiative (Research Project). The Joint Education Trust, Witwatersrand.
van der Berg, S., & Gustafsson, M. (2023). Educational Outcomes in Post-apartheid South Africa: Signs of Progress Despite Great Inequality in Spaull, N. & Jansen, J. D. (Eds.), South African Schooling: The Enigma of Inequality--A Study of the Present Situation and Future Possibilities. (pp. 25 – 45), Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18811-5
Venkat, H., & Spaull, N. (2015). What do we know about primary teachers’ mathematical content knowledge in South Africa? An analysis of SACMEQ 2007. International Journal of Educational Development, 41, 121–130.
Volmink, J. (2023;). Challenges Facing Curriculum Reform in South Africa. In Shimizu, Y. & Vithal, R. (Eds.) Mathematics Curriculum Reforms Around the World: The 24th ICMI Study. (pp. 419 – 427). Springer https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-031-13548-4
Watson, A., & Mason, J. (1998). Questions and Prompts for Mathematical Thinking. Association of Teachers of Mathematics.
Wedege, T. (2010). Connecting theories in mathematics education: from bricolage to professionalism. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 15(1), 59–78.
Wiliam, D. (2016). Leadership [for] teachers learning: Creating a culture where all teachers improve so that all students succeed. Learning Sciences International.
Wittmann, E. C. (2021). Connecting mathematics and mathematics education: Collected papers on mathematics education as a design science (p. 318). Springer Nature.. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61570-3
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 Benita P. Nel, Cyril Julie, Faaiz Gierdien, Marius Simons, Bruce May
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
