Pedagogical responsiveness of mathematics instruction at inclusive secondary schools: A particularistic case study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38140/ijss-2024.vol4.s1.04Keywords:
Inclusive education, social equality, mathematics teaching, visual impairment, hearing impairmentAbstract
This qualitative particularistic case study explores the perspectives and experiences of learners with visual and hearing impairments regarding the teaching of mathematics. Extreme-case sampling was employed to select four learners (three hearing impaired and one visually impaired) from the only two inclusive secondary schools in the northern part of Namibia. The study qualitative study utilised open-ended questionnaires and interviews. Verbatim quotes from the research participants were used as inferences to identify descriptors within the first-generation Cultural Historical Activity Theory, which served as a theoretical and analytical tool. The findings revealed that the activity system of learners with visual and hearing impairments exhibited tensions that negatively affected their performance in mathematics. Learners experienced marginal responsive pedagogy in mathematics classrooms due to teachers' lack of knowledge and pedagogical skills for delivering meaningful mathematical instruction. While learners without disabilities struggled with comprehension and effective communication skills, learners with visual and hearing impairments faced a lack of equipment to support the conceptualisation and visualisation of mathematical subject content. The authors emphasise the critical importance of addressing communication barriers and adapting teaching practices to support the learning and inclusion of visually and hearing-impaired learners in mathematics, with an emphasis on mathematical language that promotes a better understanding of mathematical concepts. Teacher training should also incorporate responsive pedagogy to enhance outcomes and foster a more inclusive learning environment that promotes academic success and positive social experiences for all learners. Recommendations at a policy level, including advocating for a decolonised curriculum were made.
References
Alborz, A., Slee, R., & Miles, S. (2013). Establishing the foundations for an inclusive education system in Iraq: reflection on findings from a nationwide survey. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 17(9), 965–987. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2012.725776
Ampweya, S. N. (2022). Academic Challenges Faced By Learners With Visual Impairments At Two Inclusive Education Secondary Schools in Namibia a Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Education (Inclusive Education) of the Univers [University of Namibia].
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioural change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
Barnes, C., & Sheldon, A. (2010). Disability, politics and poverty in a majority world context. Disability & Society, 25(7), 771–782. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2010.520889
Bruwer, B. J., & February, P. J. (2019). The Evolution of Deaf Education in Namibia. Deaf Education Beyond the Western World, January, 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190880514.003.0003
Curtin, A., & Hall, K. (2018). Research methods for pedagogy: seeing the hidden and hard to know. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 41(4), 367–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2018.1495366
Dalmau, M. C., & Guðjónsdóttir, H. (2017). Generating responsive pedagogy in inclusive practice. In M. C. Dalmau, H. Guðjónsdóttir, & D. Tidwell (Eds.), Taking a fresh look at education: Professional learning (pp. 9–22). SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-869-3_2
Daniels, H., & Tse, H. M. (2020). Bernstein and Vygotsky: How the outside comes in, and the inside goes out. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 42(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2020.1852070
DeCarlo, M. (2018). Scientific Inquiry in Social Work. Open Social Work Education.
Dreyer, L. M. (2015). Responding to the diverse needs of learners with disabilities. In Disability in Context: A Socio-educational Perspective in South Africa. Cengage Learning, Andover. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312850850_Responding_to_diverse_needs_of_children_with_disabilities/citations#fullTextFileContent
Education Management Information System (EMIS). (2021). Education Statistics. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=lls&AN=25163548&site=ehost-live
Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualisation. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080020028747
Engeström, Y. (2015). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://book4you.org/book/2713831/97ff72
Engeström, Y., & Miettinen, R. (1999). Introduction. Perspectives on Activity Theory, 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812774.002
Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2021). From mediated actions to heterogeneous coalitions: four generations of activity-theoretical studies of work and learning. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 28(1), 4–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2020.1806328
Flavin, M. (2017). Disruptive technology enhanced learning: The use and misuse of digital technologies in higher education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57284-4_2
Freire, P. (2017). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Penguin Modern Classics.
Goodley, D. (2017). Disability studies: Theorising disablism and ableism. Sage Publications.
Government of the Republic of Namibia. (2004). Namibia Vision 2030 Policy Framework for Long-Term National Development. Office of the President. https://www.npc.gov.na/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/vision_2030.pdf
Hakkarainen, P. (1999). Play and motivation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R.-L. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 231–249). Cambridge University Press.
Handicap International - Humanity & Inclusion. (2022). Children with disabilities still excluded from school. https://www.hi.org/en/news/children-with-disabilities-still---excluded-from-school
Kapenda, H. M. (2015). Practices of learner-centred mathematics curriculum in senior secondary schools in the Khomas region. Journal for the Namibian Educational Research Association (NERA), 11(1), 65–80.
Kasanda, C., Lubben, F., Gaoseb, N., Kandjeo-Marenga, H. U., Kapenda, H. M., & Campbell, B. (2005). The role of everyday contexts in learner-centred teaching: The practice in Namibian secondary schools. International Journal of Science Education, 27(15), 1805–1823. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500277854
Kohanová, I. (2011). Technologies and tools in teaching Mathematics to visually impaired students. In E. Pytlak, M., Rowland, T., Swoboda (Ed.), Proceedings of the Seventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME 7, February 9- 13, 2011). University of Rzeszów and ERME.
Leach, J., & Moon, B. (2008). The power of pedagogy. Sage Publications.
Luckner, J. L., Bruce, S. M., & Ferrell, K. A. (2016). A summary of the communication and literacy evidence-based practices for students who are deaf or hard of hearing, visually impaired, and deafblind. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 37(4), 225–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525740115597507
Maguvhe, M. (2015). Teaching science and mathematics to students with visual impairments: Reflections of a visually impaired technician. African Journal of Disability, 4(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v4i1.194
Manchishi, S. (2015). Factors contributing to low achievement levels in mathematics among hearing impaired learners: A case of selected schools of Lusaka, Zambia [The University of Zambia].
Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Ministry of Education. (2013). Sector Policy on Inclusive Education. Ministry Education.
Mungunda, A. E. (2023). Challenges faced by mathematics teachers in teaching secondary school learners with visual impairment in the Khomas region [Univeristy of Namibia].
National Development Plan (NDP5). (2017). Namibia’s 5th National Development Plan (NDP5). National Planning Commission.
Nicholson, P. M. (2022). Pedagogy, culture and transition: a qualitative, collective case study exploring pedagogies of the transition from Reception to Year One in England [University of Leicester].
Nicholson, P. M. (2023). Pedagogy-as-praxis: a sociocultural framework for researching pedagogy as performance and discourse. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 46(5), 460–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2023.2167977
Nilsen, S. (2020). Inside but still on the outside? Teachers’ experiences with the inclusion of pupils with special educational needs in general education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 24(9), 980–996. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1503348
Ramberg, L. (2024). Barriers and Strategies for Inclusion of Students with Severe Disabilities in General Education [Bethel University]. https://spark.bethel.edu/etd/1051
Sheyapo, M. (2017). Perspectives of lecturers on pedagogical inclusion of students with visual impairments at higher education institutions in Namibia [University of Namibia]. https://repository.unam.edu.na/server/api/core/bitstreams/b0ebd635-1de2-47ac-9f68-c115ef8749a0/content
Smith, K., Gamlem, S. M., Sandal, A. K., & Engelsen, K. S. (2016). Educating for the future: A conceptual framework of responsive pedagogy. Cogent Education, 3(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1227021
Spinczyk, D., Ma?kowski, M., Kempa, W., & Rojewska, K. (2019). Factors influencing the process of learning mathematics among visually impaired and blind people. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 104, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.10.025
Teet, E. W. (2018). Transition from clinical practitioner to leadership in nonprofit associations: A particularistic case study [University of Phoenix].
Trani, J. F., & Bakhshi, P. (2008). Challenges for assessing disability prevalence: The case of Afghanistan. European Journal of Disability Research, 2(1), 44–64. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875067207000326
United Nations (UN). (2023). Sustainable Development Goal 4: Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all. Sustainable Development Goals. https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal4
United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). (2015). The bumpy road to education. https://www.unicef.org/namibia/Inclusive_Education_HIS_print.pdf
United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2009). Review of Contexts and Structures for Education for Sustainable Development. United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization
United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2017). Education for Sustainable Development Goals: Learning Objectives. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000247444
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (Vol. 86). Harvard University Press. https://b-ok.africa/book/2472639/02dc1b
Walton, E., & Osman, R. (2022). Pedagogical Responsiveness in Complex Contexts. In R. (Eds) Walton, E., Osman (Ed.), Pedagogical Responsiveness in Complex Contexts (pp. 1–20). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12718-2_1
Yin, R. K. (2001). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed., Vol. 53, Issue 5). https://doi.org/10.1177/109634809702100108
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 Leena Ngonyofi Kanandjebo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
