Enhancing learner support with culturally responsive pedagogy in rural South African schools using technology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38140/ijrcs-2026.vol8.1.04Keywords:
Culturally responsive pedagogy, rural schools, educational technology integration, learner support, diversity and inclusion, Ubuntu philosophyAbstract
Educators in South African rural secondary schools encounter the dual challenge of addressing diverse learner needs across cultural, linguistic, and socioeconomic contexts while contending with inadequate technology utilisation. This conceptual paper examines the intersection of culturally responsive pedagogy and technology to propose a contextually relevant framework for learner support, emphasising the role of action research in developing responsive methodologies. A theory synthesis narrative literature review of peer-reviewed journals and case studies was conducted, guided by three analytical frameworks: Constructivist Learning Theory (individual knowledge construction), African Ubuntu philosophy ("I am because we are" communal epistemology), and Connectivism (networked learning). Six inductively derived themes emerged: learner support dimensions; pedagogical integration of technology; cultural and technological barriers; diversity, equity, and inclusion in pedagogy; best practices in technology utilisation; and technology for future preparedness. Findings suggest that technology can enhance academic and motivational support but may inadequately address emotional needs without deliberate integration. Cultural barriers, resistance from learners and educators, and historical inequalities between affluent and rural schools, exacerbated by limited resources and infrastructure, contribute to uneven outcomes and leave learners ill-prepared for rapid technological change. The proposed framework, grounded in the three analytical perspectives, outlines pathways for application within action research paradigms. Partnerships among rural schools, the Department of Basic Education, universities, and communities are recommended to foster innovative, culturally responsive teaching and enable continuous refinement. Cautious integration of emerging technologies is advocated to decolonise conventional methods, with community collaboration and experimentation central to sustainable pedagogical transformation.
References
Adeola, O. (2024). Leveraging Ubuntu-inspired values to promote sustainable digital entrepreneurship in Africa. Africa Journal of Management, 10(2), 120-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322373.2024.2349484
Akudjedu, T. N., Ago, J. L., Iweka, E., & Dushimirimana, S. (2026). Evidence synthesis strategies and indications for scoping and systematic reviews: A methodological guide and recommendations for radiography research. Radiography, 32(1), 103238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2025.103238
Alam, A. (2023). Connectivism learning theory and connectivist approach in teaching and learning: a review of literature. Bhartiyam International Journal of Education & Research, 12(2), 1-15.
Alam, M. A. (2024). Connectivism and Traditional Learning Theories: Implications for Contemporary Educational and Pedagogical Practices. Bhartiyam Int. J. Educ. Res., 14, 1-24.
Altavilla, E. (2025). Addressing the Achievement Gap Through Equitable Education by Meeting the Social Emotional and Academic Needs of Minority Students in Urban School Districts [Doctoral dissertation, Franklin University].
Bidwell, N. J., Reitmaier, T., Marsden, G., & Hansen, S. (2010). Designing with mobile digital storytelling in rural Africa. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1593-1602), Proceedings of CHI 2010, Atlanta, USA. http://pubs.cs.uct.ac.za/id/eprint/630
Bollaert, C., Bollaert, C., & Taylor. (2019). Reconciliation and building a sustainable peace. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03655-3
Boughey, C., & McKenna, S. (2021). Understanding higher education: Alternative perspectives (p. 172). African Minds. ePub edition: 978-1-928502-23-4. https://www.africanminds.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Understanding-Higher-Education-WEB-01072021.pdf
Bradbury, H., Waddell, S., O'Brien, K., Apgar, M., Teehankee, B., & Fazey, I. (2019). A call to action research for transformations: The times demand it. Action Research, 17(1), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750319829633
Campbell, M., Egan, M., Lorenc, T., Bond, L., Popham, F., Fenton, C., & Benzeval, M. (2014). Considering methodological options for reviews of theory: Illustrated by a review of theories linking income and health. Systematic Reviews, 3(1), 114. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-114
Chan, C. K. Y., & Lee, K. K. (2023). The AI generation gap: Are Gen Z students more interested in adopting generative AI such as ChatGPT in teaching and learning than their Gen X and millennial generation teachers? Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 60. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.02878
Chandrappa, P. K. (2018). Connectivism as a learning theory for the digital age. Adhyayan: A Journal of Management Sciences, 8(01), 37-47. https://smsjournals.com/index.php/Adhyayan/article/view/2092
Chisango, G., & Marongwe, N. (2021). The digital divide at three disadvantaged secondary schools in Gauteng, South Africa. Journal of Education (University of KwaZulu-Natal), (82), 149-165. https://doi.org/10.17159/2520-9868/i82a09
Cooper, H., Hedges, L. V., & Valentine, J. C. (Eds.). (2019). The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. Russell Sage Foundation. ISBN 978-0-87154-163-5.
Dalle, J., Aydin, H., & Wang, C. X. (2024). Cultural dimensions of technology acceptance and adaptation in learning environments. Journal of Formative Design in Learning, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-024-00095-x
Dziubaniuk, O., Ivanova-Gongne, M., & Nyholm, M. (2023). Learning and teaching sustainable business in the digital era: A connectivism theory approach. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00390-w
Goldie, J. G. S. (2016). Connectivism: A knowledge learning theory for the digital age. Medical Teacher, 38(10), 1064–1069. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2016.1173661
Greenhalgh, T., Kristjansson, E., & Robinson, V. (2007). Realist review to understand the efficacy of school feeding programmes. BMJ, 335, 858–861. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39359.525174.AD
Hart, S. A. (2023). Identifying the factors impacting the uptake of educational technology in South African schools: A systematic review. South African Journal of Education, 43(1). https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v43n1a2174
Hess, P. (2020). Becoming fully human in community: A critical theology of Ubuntu (Doctoral dissertation, University of Birmingham). http://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/eprint/10552
Howie, S. J., Combrinck, C., Tshele, M., Roux, K., McLeod Palane, N., & Mokoena, G. (2017). PIRLS 2016: South African highlights report. Centre for Evaluation and Assessment (CEA).https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.11110.73282https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326588545_South_Africa_Grade_4_PIRLS_Literacy_2016_Highlights_Report_South_Africa
Issah, F. (2025). African restorative justice philosophy: Practicing the Ubuntu paradigm in the composition classroom [Doctoral dissertation, Wayne State University].
Kaziya, K. (2025). A systematic review of technology integration in mathematics education: Perspectives from rural Zambia in Kalomo District. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6374363/v1
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2005). Participatory action research: Communicative action and the public sphere. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 559–603). Sage Publications Ltd. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2005-07735-023
Here is the text formatted in APA 7th edition style:
Kop, R., & Hill, A. (2008). Connectivism: Learning theory of the future or vestige of the past. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 9(3), 1-13. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=587575
Ladeira, I., Bidwell, N. J., & Sigaji, X. (2014). Digital storytelling design learning from non-digital narratives: Two case studies in South Africa. Oral History Journal of South Africa, 2(1), 41-55. https://doi.org/10.25159/2309-5792/1582
Letseka, M. (2022). A systematic review of digital storytelling as an educational tool for teaching and learning in Southern Africa. In Multimodal learning environments in Southern Africa: Embracing digital pedagogies (pp. 165-195). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11071343
Mampota, S., Mokhets'engoane, S. J., & Kurata, L. (2023). Connectivism theory: Exploring its relevance in informing Lesotho's integrated curriculum for effective learning in the digital age. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 4(4), 6-12. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2023.4.4.705
Manyadze, M. (2023). Mobile learning readiness assessment model in South African rural high school: A case of Limpopo Province (Doctoral dissertation, Tshwane University of Technology). South Africa.
Mattar, J. (2018). Constructivism and connectivism in educational technology: Active, situated, authentic, experiential, and anchored learning. RIED-Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 21(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.21.2.20055
McIntosh, N. A., & Bowman, C. L. (2019). Reflections: Professional development using a gradual release model to facilitate culturally responsive strategies in a rural secondary school curriculum in Malawi. International Journal of Educational Reform, 28(3), 235-252. https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.19.4.20460
Mensah, E., & Baidoo-Anu, D. (2022). Towards quality and equitable education in South Africa: Unpacking the relationship between teacher factors, students' socioeconomic background and mathematics achievements. Research in Mathematics, 9(1), 2088645. https://doi.org/10.1080/27684830.2022.2088645
Mojapelo, S. M., & Durodolu, O. O. (2022). Information and communications technologies in library facilities in disadvantaged rural schools in South Africa: Lessons from Limpopo province. Education for Information, 38(2), 113-131. https://dblp.org/rec/journals/efi/MojapeloD22
Moleko, T. B. (2024). The exploration of the experiences of alienation in education for rural high school learners in the Eastern Cape province, South Africa. In T. B. Moleko & N. Xulu-Gama (Eds.), Learning disrupted through high school dropouts: Perceptions of access to education in the Eastern Cape of South Africa (pp. 464-482). South African Review of Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1080/21528586.2024.2417795
Moore, H. L., & Coulibaly-Willis, E. (2025). Ubuntu and African approaches to prosperity. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10211761/1/IGP_Working_Paper_Ubuntu_DIGITAL.pdf
Moyo, I., & Ndlovu-Gatsheni, S. J. (Eds.). (2024). The COVID-19 pandemic and the politics of life. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/The-COVID-19-Pandemic-and-the-Politics-of-Life/Moyo-Ndlovu-Gatsheni/p/book/9781032540993
Mugumbate, J., & Nyanguru, A. (2013). Exploring African philosophy: The value of ubuntu in social work. African Journal of Social Work, 3(1), 82-100. https://hdl.handle.net/10779/uow.27716778
Mugumbate, J. R., Mupedziswa, R., Twikirize, J. M., Mthethwa, E., Desta, A. A., & Oyinlola, O. (2024). Understanding ubuntu and its contribution to social work education in Africa and other regions of the world. Social Work Education, 43(4), 1123–1139. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2023.2168638
Mukhlis, H., Haenilah, E. Y., Maulina, D., & Nursafitri, L. (2024). Connectivism and digital age education: Insights, challenges, and future directions. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 45(3). https://doi.org/10.34044/j.kjss.2024.45.3.11
Mustakim, M., Samad, I. S., Jabri, U., Ismail, I., & Elihamid, E. (2025). Enhancing quality education through cooperative learning in remote areas. Ta'dib, 28(1), 275-284. https://doi.org/10.31958/jt.v28i1.14950
Ngubane, N., & Makua, M. (2021). Intersection of ubuntu pedagogy and social justice: Transforming South African higher education. Transformation in Higher Education, 6(a113), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.4102/the.v6i0.11
Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (2008). The psychology of the child. Basic Books. https://www.amazon.com/Psychology-Child-Jean-Piaget/dp/0465095003
Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2008). The SAGE handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. https://ikhsanaira.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/action-research-participative-inquiry-and-practice-reasonbradburry.pdf
Shadrack, O. (2025). Respect as a pillar of African Ubuntu philosophy. Nigerian Journal of Philosophy, 8(2), 1-8. https://acjol.org/index.php/NJP/article/view/6322/6121
Shalo Tchombe, T. M. (2024). Sustainability and inclusion from African perspectives. Cameroon Academy of Sciences Journal, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.4314/jcas.v20i3.8
Sibanda, J., & Marongwe, N. (2022). Projecting the nature of education for the future: Implications for current practice. Journal of Culture and Values in Education, 5(2), 47-64. https://doi.org/10.46303/jcve.2022.19
Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), Article 1. http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Jan_05/article01.htm
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Sonia, G. (Ed.). (2017). Educational research and innovation: Pedagogical knowledge and the changing nature of the teaching profession. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/pedagogical-knowledge-and-the-changing-nature-of-the-teaching-profession_9789264270695-en.html
Suliman, Z., Mohale, N. E., Maphoto, K. B., & Sevnarayan, K. (2024). The interconnectedness between Ubuntu principles and generative artificial intelligence in distance higher education institutions. Discover Education, 3(1), 188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00289-2
Thangeni, F. (2022). Digital leadership: Towards developing an innovative technology-led culture of learning in rural Limpopo schools [Master's thesis, University of Johannesburg, South Africa]. https://hdl.handle.net/10210/502271
Tricco, A. C., Soobiah, C., Antony, J., Cogo, E., MacDonald, H., Lillie, E., ... & Kastner, M. (2016). A scoping review identifies multiple emerging knowledge synthesis methods, but few studies operationalize the method. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 73, 19-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.08.030
Tshipetane, A. (2025). Socioeconomic inequalities in COVID-19 outcomes in South Africa (Master's thesis). University of Cape Town, South Africa. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/41972
Utecht, J., & Keller, D. (2019). Becoming relevant again: Applying connectivism learning theory to today's classrooms. Critical Questions in Education, 10(2), 107-119. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1219672
Wangui, R. N., Ronoh, R., & Etene, Y. (2024). Exploring interactive learning approaches and technology integration in the Kenyan education system. Pan-African Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 5(1), 103-111. https://doi.org/10.56893/pajes2024v05i01.08
Wessels, E., & Wood, L. (2019). Fostering teachers' experiences of well-being: A participatory action learning and action research approach. South African Journal of Education, 39(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v39n1a1619
Winschiers-Theophilus, H., Smith, R. C., Van Amstel, F. M., & Botero, A. (2025). Decolonisation and participatory design. In Routledge international handbook of contemporary participatory design (pp. 111-137). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003334330
Wood, L. (2019). Participatory action learning and action research: Theory, practice and process. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429441318
Zajda, J. (2021). Constructivist learning theory and creating effective learning environments. In Globalisation and education reforms: Creating effective learning environments (pp. 35-50). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71575-5_3
Zuber-Skerritt, O., Wood, L., & Kearney, N. (2020). The transformative potential of action learning in community-based research for social action. Action Learning for Social Action, 17(1), 34–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767333.2020.1712840
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Newlin Marongwe, Marinda Neethling, Desire Chiwandire
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
