A participatory lens to enhance collaborative learning among university students in rural South Africa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38140/ijrcs-2024.vol6.19Keywords:
Participatory lens, collaborative learning, rural university students, social learning theoryAbstract
Collaborative learning has been recognised as a highly effective approach to enhancing critical thinking, problem-solving, and overall academic performance. However, rural university students face unique challenges that may hinder their participation and engagement in collaborative learning activities. This gap may subsequently affect their learning effectiveness, leading to poor academic performance. Therefore, this study explores the challenges faced by rurally located university students in collaborative learning and strategies to enhance their participation. The study is underpinned by social learning theory and framed within a transformative paradigm using a qualitative research approach. Participatory Research was employed as a research design to provide inclusive opportunities for participants to be actively involved in the process of finding solutions to their problems. Focus group discussions were conducted to elicit information from 10 randomly selected rural university students enrolled in a particular module at a selected university in the Eastern Cape province. Thematic analysis was utilised to analyse the data. The results indicate that the main challenges faced by rural university students in collaborative learning include limited access to resources and technology, conflicting time schedules, and the unavailability of students. In contrast, providing adequate access to resources and technology, along with social and institutional support, is essential for enhancing collaborative learning among students in rural universities. In conclusion, promoting collaborative learning among rural university students requires universities to invest in adequate resources, implement flexible learning schedules, and create supportive learning environments.
References
Abosalem, Y. (2016). Assessment techniques and students’ higher-order thinking skills. International Journal of Secondary Education, 4(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsedu.20160401.11
Alhinty, M. (2014, November). Young language learners' collaborative learning and social interaction as a motivational aspect of the iPad. In 2014 International Conference on Interactive Mobile Communication Technologies and Learning (IMCL2014) (pp. 64-69). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IMCTL.2014.7011106
Allan, J. (2017). An analysis of Albert Bandura's aggression: A social learning analysis. CRC Press.
Al-Rahmi, W. M., & Zeki, A. M. (2017). A model of using social media for collaborative learning to enhance learners’ performance on learning. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences, 29(4), 526-535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2016.09.002
Al-Samarraie, H., & Saeed, N. (2018). A systematic review of cloud computing tools for collaborative learning: Opportunities and challenges to the blended-learning environment. Computers & Education, 124, 77-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.016
Arnold, D., Glässel, A., Böttger, T., Sarma, N., Bethmann, A., & Narimani, P. (2022). “What do you need? What are you experiencing?” Relationship building and power dynamics in participatory research projects: Critical self-reflections of researchers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(15), 9336. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159336
Aruleba, K., & Jere, N. (2022). Exploring digital transforming challenges in rural areas of South Africa through a systematic review of empirical studies. Scientific African, e01190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2022.e01190
Barlas, C. (2000). Towards a changing paradigm: Transformative learning and social change action. California Institute of Integral Studies.
Barrett, D., & Twycross, A. (2018). Data collection in qualitative research. Evidence-Based Nursing, 21(3), 63–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/eb-2018-102939
Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House, 83(2), 39–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650903505415
Bergold, J., & Thomas, S. (2012). Participatory research methods: A methodological approach in motion. Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, 191-222. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41756482
Brieger, E., Arghode, V., & McLean, G. (2020). Connecting theory and practice: Reviewing six learning theories to inform online instruction. European Journal of Training and Development, 44(4/5), 321-339. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-07-2019-0116
Castleberry, A., & Nolen, A. (2018). Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: Is it as easy as it sounds?. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 10(6), 807-815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2018.03.019
Castleberry, A., & Nolen, A. (2018). Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: Is it as easy as it sounds? Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 10(6), 807–815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2018.03.019
Chakraborty, P., Mittal, P., Gupta, M. S., Yadav, S., & Arora, A. (2021). Opinion of students on online education during the COVID?19 pandemic. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 3(3), 357–365.
Cornwall, A., & Jewkes, R. (1995). What is participatory research? Social Science & Medicine, 41(12), 1667–1676. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00127-S
Deaton, S. (2015). Social learning theory in the age of social media: Implications for educational practitioners. Journal of Educational Technology, 12(1), 1–6. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1098574
Doyle, M., & Timonen, V. (2010). Lessons from a community-based participatory research project: Older people’s and researchers’ reflections. Research on Aging, 32(2), 244–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027509351477
Dube, B. (2020). Rural online learning in the context of COVID-19 in South Africa: Evoking an inclusive education approach. Multidisciplinary Journal of Educational Research, 10(2), 135–157. https://doi.org/10.17583/remie.2020.5607
Dzansi, D. Y., & Amedzo, K. (2014). Integrating ICT into rural South African schools: Possible solutions for challenges. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 6(2), 341–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/09751122.2014.11890145
Edinyang, S. D. (2016). The significance of social learning theories in the teaching of social studies education. International Journal of Sociology and Anthropology Research, 2(1), 40–45.
García-Morales, V. J., Garrido-Moreno, A., & Martín-Rojas, R. (2021). The transformation of higher education after the COVID disruption: Emerging challenges in an online learning scenario. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 616059. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.616059
Godat, M. (2012). Collaborative learning and critical thinking in technology-enhanced environments: An instructional design framework [Doctoral thesis, Queensland University of Technology].
Gorvine, B. J., & Smith, H. D. (2015). Predicting student success in a psychological statistics course emphasising collaborative learning. Teaching of Psychology, 42(1), 56–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628314562679
Häkkinen, P., Järvelä, S., Mäkitalo-Siegl, K., Ahonen, A., Näykki, P., & Valtonen, T. (2017). Preparing teacher-students for twenty-first-century learning practices (PREP 21): A framework for enhancing collaborative problem-solving and strategic learning skills. Teachers and Teaching, 23(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1203772
Hortigüela-Alcalá, D., Hernando Garijo, A., Pérez-Pueyo, Á., & Fernández-Río, J. (2019). Cooperative learning and students’ motivation, social interactions and attitudes: Perspectives from two different educational stages. Sustainability, 11(24), 7005. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247005
Howorth, C., Smith, S. M., & Parkinson, C. (2012). Social learning and social entrepreneurship education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(3), 371–389. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2011.0022
Jackson, K. M., Pukys, S., Castro, A., Hermosura, L., Mendez, J., Vohra-Gupta, S., ... & Morales, G. (2018). Using the transformative paradigm to conduct a mixed methods needs assessment of a marginalised community: Methodological lessons and implications. Evaluation and Program Planning, 66, 111–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.09.010
James, R., Wyn, J., Baldwin, G., Hepworth, G., McInnis, C., & Stephanou, A. (1999). Rural and isolated school students and their higher education choices: A re-examination of student location, socioeconomic background, and educational advantage and disadvantage. Commissioned report. http://www.dety?.gov.au/nbeet/publications/#hec
Jena, R. K. (2015). Technostress in ICT enabled collaborative learning environment: An empirical study among Indian academicians. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 1116–1123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.020
Jeong, H., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2016). Seven affordances of computer-supported collaborative learning: How to support collaborative learning? How can technologies help? Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 247-265. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1158654
Jimola, D. F. E., & Ofodu, G. O. (2021). Sustaining learning during COVID-19 seismic shift: The need to develop flexible pedagogy. Interdisciplinary Journal of Education Research, 3(1), 14-26. https://doi.org/10.51986/ijer-2021.vol3.01.02
Jinadu, D. A., Oyaremi, D. M., & Rufai, D. M. (2021). Assessment of the Oyo State Teaching Service Commission interactive learning platforms during COVID-19 lockdown in Nigeria. Interdisciplinary Journal of Education Research, 3(1), 37-44. https://doi.org/10.51986/ijer-2021.vol3.01.04
Kemparaj, U., & Chavan, S. (2013). Qualitative research: A brief description. Indian Journal of Medical Sciences, 67(3/4), 89-98. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5359.121127
Kiger, M. E., & Varpio, L. (2020). Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Medical Teacher, 42(8), 846-854. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030
Kilgo, C. A., Ezell Sheets, J. K., & Pascarella, E. T. (2015). The link between high-impact practices and student learning: Some longitudinal evidence. Higher Education, 69, 509–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9788-z
Kirkgöz, Y. (2014). English language teaching in Turkey: Challenges for the 21st century. In Teaching English to the World (pp. 159–170). Routledge.
Klette, K., Sahlström, F., Blikstad-Balas, M., Luoto, J., Tanner, M., Tengberg, M., ... & Slotte, A. (2018). Justice through participation: Student engagement in Nordic classrooms. Education Inquiry, 9(1), 57–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2018.1428036
Lee, J., Song, H. D., & Hong, A. J. (2019). Exploring factors and indicators for measuring students’ sustainable engagement in e-learning. Sustainability, 11(4), 985. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11040985
McGregor, S. L. (2009). Reorienting consumer education using social learning theory: Sustainable development via authentic consumer pedagogy. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33(3), 258–266. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2009.00766.x
Mertens, D. M. (2010). Transformative mixed methods research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6), 469–474. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410364612
Naidoo, S., & Raju, J. (2012). Impact of the digital divide on information literacy training in a higher education context. South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science, 78(1), 34–44. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC129280
Omodan, B. I., & Ige, O. A. (2021). Sustaining collaborative learning among university students in the wake of COVID-19: The perspective of online community project. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(1), 356–371. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.1.20
Omodan, B. I., & Ige, O. A. (2021). University students’ perceptions of curriculum content delivery during COVID-19 new normal in South Africa. Qualitative Research in Education, 10(2), 204–227. https://doi.org/10.17583/qre.2021.7446
Omodan, B. I., & Tsotetsi, C. T. (2020). Decolonisation of knowledge construction in university classrooms: The place of social constructivism. African Journal of Gender, Society & Development, 9(2), 183–204. http://dx.doi.org/10.31920/2634-3622/2020/9n2a10
Rahi, S. (2017). Research design and methods: A systematic review of research paradigms, sampling issues, and instrument development. International Journal of Economics & Management Sciences, 6(2), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.4172/2162-6359.1000403
Skinner, W. F., & Fream, A. M. (1997). A social learning theory analysis of computer crime among college students. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 34(4), 495–518. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427897034004005
Swartz, S., & Scott, D. (2012, August). Restitution: A revised paradigm for the transformation of poverty and inequality in South Africa. In Strategies to overcome poverty and inequality: Towards Carnegie 3 Conference, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa (pp. 3-5).
Thota, N. (2015). Connectivism and the use of technology/media in collaborative teaching and learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2015(142), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20131
Toven-Lindsey, B., Rhoads, R. A., & Lozano, J. B. (2015). Virtually unlimited classrooms: Pedagogical practices in massive open online courses. The Internet and higher education, 24, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.07.001
Walton, E., Bowman, B., & Osman, R. (2015). Promoting access to higher education in an unequal society. South African Journal of Higher Education, 29(1), 262–269. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC172787
Wilkinson, S. (2015). Focus groups. In Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (3rd ed., pp. 199–221). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Woodward, W. R. (1982). The "discovery" of social behaviourism and social learning theory, 1870–1980. American Psychologist, 37(4), 396–410. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.37.4.396
Zhu, Z. T., Yu, M. H., & Riezebos, P. (2016). A research framework of smart education. Smart learning environments, 3, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-016-0026-2
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 Bunmi Isaiah Omodan, Andy Mafunda, Enathi Mbebe, Somikazi Mdolota
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
