Learning in Eclectic Formative Assessment Strategies: Experiences of Accounting Pre-service Teachers in one Higher Education Institution
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38140/obp2-2024-03Keywords:
Eclectic assessment strategies, formative assessment practices, pre-service teachers’ experiences, principled eclecticism, accounting educationAbstract
One of the goals of Accounting education is to develop graduates capable of equipping learners with analytical skills pertinent to analysing and understanding financial information required for making economic decisions. Gaining and developing the knowledge and skills necessary for learning Accounting demands full engagement from both students and teachers throughout the learning process. This is primarily achieved through the application of wide-ranging formative assessment strategies that allow students to actively engage in learning while being challenged to think critically. This paper, therefore, aims to understand how the eclectic assessment practices of academics in a School of Education in South Africa contributed to preparing pre-service teachers for teaching. It explores the learning experiences of fourth-year Accounting students through eclectic formative assessment strategies. A qualitative case study approach within an interpretive paradigm was employed to explore the experiences of thirty purposively selected Accounting pre-service teachers. Framed by principled eclecticism, a thematic analysis of transcripts generated from semi-structured individual telephonic interviews with thirty students and WhatsApp-based focused group interviews was conducted to elicit students' views on their eclectic formative assessment practices. Insights from this study will be helpful to academics who aim to produce future teachers with the requisite skills to train the future workforce of any country. Teacher education institutions and other higher education institutions would also stand to benefit from the outcomes, which have the potential to guide policy directions to enhance the quality of undergraduate education, which is their key mandate.
References
Abbott, J.I., & Palatnik, B.R. (2018). Students' perceptions of their accounting class: Implications for instructors. Accounting Education, 27(1), 72–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2017.1381032
Alharbi, S. H. (2017). Principled Eclecticism: Approach and Application in Teaching Writing to ESL/EFL Students. English Language Teaching, 10(2), 33–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n2p33
Alonzo, D., Labad, V., Bejano, J., & Guerra, F. (2021). The policy-driven dimensions of teacher beliefs about assessment. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 46(3), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2021v46n3.3
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., . . . Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives, abridged edition. Longman.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Classroom assessment and pedagogy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(6), 551–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1441807
Baloche, L., & Brody, M.B. (2017). Cooperative learning: Exploring challenges, crafting innovations. Journal of Education for Teaching, 43(3), 274–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2017.1319513
Brevik, L. M., Blikstad-Balas, M., & Engelien, K. L. (2017). Integrating assessment for learning in the teacher education programme at the University of Oslo. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 24(2), 164–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2016.1239611
Cagasan, L., Care, E., Robertson, P., & Luo, R. (2020). Developing a formative assessment protocol to examine formative assessment practices in the Philippines. Educational Assessment, 25(4), 259–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2020.1766960
Cohen, L., L. Manion, & K. Morrison. (2018). Research methods in Education. 7th Edition. Routledge.
Creswell, J.W. & Creswell, J.D. (Eds.). (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.
Creswell, J.W. & Poth, C.N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications.
Dayal, H. C. (2021). How Teachers Use Formative Assessment Strategies during Teaching: Evidence from the Classroom. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 46(7). DOI: 10.14221/ajte.2021v46n7.1.
Denzin, N. & Lincoln, Y.S. (eds.) (2018). The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (5th ed). Sage.
Department of Basic Education (DBE). (2011). Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement: Grades 10–12. Government Printers.
Diseko, R. & Modiba, W. (2016). Learners’ experiences of an authentic online assessment test in understanding of basic accounting content knowledge: A case study. Proceedings of ADVED 2016 2nd International Conference on Advances in Education and Social Sciences (pp. 339-350). https://doi.org/10.18768/ijaedu.280378.
Edokpolor, J. E. (2018). The use of Student-Centred Method in the Teaching of Business Studies in Junior Secondary Schools. Journal of Education in Developing Areas, 26(1), 20-21.
Enders, N., Gaschler, R. & Kubik, V. (2021). Online quizzes with closed questions in formal assessment: How elaborate feedback can promote learning. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 20(1), 91-106.
Frick, H, Birt, J.J. & Waters, J. (2020). Enhancing student engagement in large management accounting lectures". Accounting and Finance 60 (1), 271–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12318.
Frykedal, K. F. & Chiriac, E.H. (2018). Student Collaboration in Group Work: Inclusion as Participation. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 65(2), 183-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912x.2017.1363381
Gamage, S. H. P. W., Ayres, J. R., Behrend, M. B., & Smith, E. J. (2019). Optimising Moodle quizzes for online assessments. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 1 -14.
Gao, L. (2011). Eclecticism or principled eclecticism. Creative Education, 2(04), 363–369.
Harrison, H., Birks, M., Franklin, R., & Mills, J. (2017). Case study research: Foundations and methodological orientations. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/ Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 18(1), 1–17.
Izci, K. & Caliskan, G. (2017). Development of prospective teachers' conceptions of assessment and choices of assessment tasks. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 3(2), 464–474. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1148463.pdf
Jiang, Y. (2020). Teacher Classroom Questioning Practice and Assessment Literacy: Case Studies of Four English Language Teachers in Chinese Universities. Frontiers in Education, 5(23), 1–17.https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00023
Johansson, E., Kanapathippillai, S., Khan, A., & Dellaportas, S. (2022). Formative assessment in accounting: student perceptions and implications of continuous assessment. Accounting Education, 32(6), 597–625. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2022.2091411
Kantar, L. D., & Massouh, A. (2015). Case-based learning: what traditional curricula fail to teach. Nurse Education Today, 35(8), 14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2015.03.010
Karaman, P. (2021). The Effect of Formative Assessment Practices on Student Learning: A Meta-Analysis Study. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 8(4), 801–817. DOI: 10.21449/ijate.870300
Kim, J. (2022). A case study on an online Korean discussion class with foreign undergraduate students. The Korean Association of General Education, 16(3), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.46392/kjge.2022.16.3.167
Kumar, C. P. (2013). The eclectic method: Theory and its application to the learning of English. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 3(6), 2250–3553.
Lau, Y. & Lim, S. (2015). Learning approaches in Accounting education: Towards deep learning. Management Science Letters, 5(9), 861–866.
Macken, S., MacPhail, A. & Calderon, A. (2020). Exploring primary pre-service teachers' use of 'assessment for learning' while teaching primary physical education during school placement. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 25(5), 539–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2020.1752647
Mahoney, M. W. (2019). Peer-mediated instruction and activity schedules: tools for providing academic support for students with ASD. Teach. Except. Child, 51, 350–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059919835816
Malan, M. & Stegmann, N. (2018). Accounting students' experiences of peer assessment: A tool to develop lifelong learning. South African Journal of Accounting Research, 32(2-3), 205–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/10291954.2018.1487503
Morris, R., Perry, T., & Wardle, L. (2021). Formative assessment and feedback for learning in higher education: A systematic review. Review of Education, 9(3), e3292. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3292
Mwanza, D. S. (2017). The Eclectic Approach to Language Teaching: Its Conceptualisation and Misconceptions. International Journal of Humanities, Social Sciences and Education, 4(2), 53–67.
Pereira, L. & Sithole, B.M. (2020). Learner-Centred Pedagogy in Accounting: Understanding Its Meaning from a Bernsteinian Perspective. African Educational Research Journal, 8(1), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.30918/AERJ.81.20.002
Phan, L. T. (2018). An Evaluation of using Group Work to improve Speaking Fluency for First-Year Non-Majored English Students at Dong Nai Technology University. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 17(12), 78–98. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.17.12.5
Pukdesree, S. (2017). The comparative study of collaborative learning and SDLC model to develop IT group projects. TEM Journal, 6(4), 800-809.
Rao, P. S. (2018). The eclectic approach in English language teaching: A comprehensive study. ACADEMIA: An International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 8(10), 40–50.
Rathnum, C. D., & Moodley, M. (2022). Socio-emotional interaction in collaborative learning: Combining individual emotional experiences and group-level emotion regulation. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101589
Sotola, L.K. & Crede, M. (2021). ‘Regarding class quizzes: a meta-analytic synthesis of studies on the relationship between frequent low-stakes testing and class performance’, Educational Psychology Review, 33(2), 407-426.
Suleman, Q., & Hussain, I. (2016). Effects of eclectic learning approach on students' academic achievement and retention in English at elementary level. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(16), 32-37.
Swart, O., & Shuttleworth, C. C. (2021). The new face of alternative assessment in accounting sciences – Technology as an anthropomorphic stakeholder. South African Journal of Higher Education, 35(3), 200–219. https://dx.doi.org/10.20853/35-3-3900
Thamrin, N. S., Madya, S., Putro, N. H. P. S., Mustakim, S. S., Hassan, A., & Retnawati, H. (2023). Eclectic approach: A search for more effective assessment ways to meet EFL assessment principles. Studies in English Language and Education, 10(2), 7. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v10i2.26682
Usagawa, T. (2018). Effectiveness of e-learning experience through online quizzes: a case study of Myanmar students. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 13(12), 1–14.
Utomo, D. P., Putri, A. M. J. & Santoso, T. (2022). Student’s Critical Thinking Ability to Solve Problems HOTS in Regular, Acceleration, and Olympics Class Programs. Jurnal Didaktik Matematika, 9(1), 125-135.
Wiliam, D. (2018). Assessment for learning: meeting the challenge of implementation. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice. 25(6), 682–685. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2017.1401526
Xinhong, Z., Boyan, Z., & Fan, Z. (2023). Student-centred case-based teaching and online-offline case discussion in postgraduate courses of computer science. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00374-2
Yan, Z., & Brown, G. T. (2021). Assessment for learning in the Hong Kong assessment reform: A case of policy borrowing. Studies in educational evaluation, 68, 100985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc. 2021.100985
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research Design and Methods. 6th Edition. Thousand Oaks, Sage Publishing.
Zendler, A., & Greiner, H. (2020). The effect of two instructional methods on learning outcome in chemistry education: the experiment method and computer simulation. Educ. Chem. Eng. 30, 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2019.09.001
Published
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 Jabulisile Ngwenya, Orhe Arek-Bawa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
