Sustaining collaborative learning in a rurally located university classroom in South Africa: Conducive conditions and possible threats
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38140/ijer-2024.vol6.04Keywords:
Collaborative learning, rural university classrooms, pre-service teachers, asset-based community development, conducive conditions.Abstract
This study investigated how collaborative learning, as a teaching and learning approach, can be enhanced to promote pre-service teachers' participation in university classrooms in rural areas of South Africa. The study aimed to identify the conducive conditions that support collaborative learning, as well as the threats that may hinder the implementation of collaborative learning in rural classrooms. Asset-based community development served as the theoretical framework for this study. A transformative paradigm was adopted, employing a participatory research design to bring together individuals with relevant experiences and opinions. The study involved fifteen participants, including five lecturers with more than five years of experience, five third-year students, and five fourth-year students from a selected university. Data was collected through focused group discussions and interviews. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data. The findings of the study revealed that connecting activities to assessment, proper planning, linking content to students' lives, and establishing a positive classroom culture were conducive conditions for collaborative learning. On the other hand, language barriers, unconducive classroom infrastructure, and lack of infrastructure were identified as factors that could hinder the implementation of collaborative learning in this study. The study recommends the creation of favourable conditions, such as aligning activities with assessments and effective planning, to promote collaborative learning among pre-service teachers in rural university classrooms in South Africa.
References
Abdullah, M. Y., Bakar, N. R. A., & Mahbob, M. H. (2012a). Student's participation in the classroom: What motivates them to speak up? Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 51, 516-522.
Abdullah, M. Y., Bakar, N. R. A., & Mahbob, M. H. (2012b). The dynamics of student participation in the classroom: Observation on level and forms of participation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 61-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.246
Ahmad, C. V. (2021). Causes of students’ reluctance to participate in classroom discussions. ASEAN Journal of Science and Engineering Education, 1(1), 47-62.
Bahmanbijar, B., Nazarieh, M., Toufan, N., Dehghani, M. R., & Beigzadeh, A. (2019). Identifying the reasons behind students' lack of participation in classroom activities using a Delphi technique. Future of Medical Education Journal, 9(2), 10-17. https://doi.org/10.22038/FMEJ.2019.15154.1091
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Ballard, K. (2018). Inclusion, paradigms, power, and participation. In Towards inclusive schools? (pp. 1-14). Routledge.
Brock-Utne, B. (2021). Language-in-Education Policies and Practices in Africa with a Special Focus on Tanzania and South Africa. In: Zajda, J. (eds) Third International Handbook of Globalisation, Education and Policy Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66003-1_35
Burke, A. (2011). Group work: How to use groups effectively. Journal of Effective Teaching, 11(2), 87-95. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1092109
Columna-Pérez, N. B. (2020). Teachers’ experiences in schools that serve rural communities in The Dominican Republic: Their readiness to respond to challenges (Dissertations, 3620) [PhD Thesis, Western Michigan University]. Western Michigan University, ScholarWorks@WMU. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/dissertations/3620
Chandra, R. (2015). Collaborative learning for educational achievement. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 5(3), 2320-7388. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-05310407
Du Plessis, P., & Mestry, R. (2019). Teachers for rural schools: Challenge for South Africa. South African Journal of Education, 39, 1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.15700/saje.v39ns1a1774
Evans, J. A. (2019). Digital learning: Peril or promise for our k-12 students. National Briefing Paper--Speak Up 2018/19. Project Tomorrow. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED605281
Etikan, I., Sulaiman, A. M., & Alkassim, R.S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
Forrester, G., Kurth, J., Vincent, P., & Oliver, M. (2020). Schools as community assets: An exploration of the merits of an asset-based community development (ABCD) approach. Educational Review, 72(4), 443–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2018.1529655
Ghufron, M. A., & Ermawati, S. (2018). The strengths and weaknesses of cooperative learning and problem-based learning in EFL writing class: Teachers' and students' perspectives. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 657-672. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11441a
Harmon, H. L. (2017). Collaboration: A partnership solution in rural education. The Rural Educator, 38(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.35608/ruraled.v38i1.230
Halverson, L. R., & Graham, C. R. (2019). Learner engagement in blended learning environments: A conceptual framework. Online Learning, 23(2), 145-178.
Han, Y., & Xu, Y. (2020). The development of student feedback literacy: the influences of teacher feedback on peer feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(5), 680-696. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1689545
Haines, A. (2014). Asset-based community development. In An introduction to community development (pp. 67-78). Routledge.
Imleesh, M., Mohammed, R., Handoyo, E., Hasibuan, H., & Adriani, M. (2023). A Teacher-Lecturer Virtual Collaborative Lesson Study for Teaching Social Sciences in a Libyan Junior High School: An Experimental Study. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 31 (1), 452-463. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.31.1.24
Järvenoja, H., Malmberg, J., Törmänen, T., Mänty, K., Haataja, E., Ahola, S., & Järvelä, S. (2020). A collaborative learning design for promoting and analysing adaptive motivation and emotion regulation in the science classroom. In Frontiers in Education (5, p. 111). Educational Psychology
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00111
Jensen, K. B. (2020). The qualitative research process. In A handbook of media and communication research (pp. 286-306). Routledge.
Lenkauskait?, J., Colomer, J., & Bubnys, R. (2020). Students’ social construction of knowledge through cooperative learning. Sustainability, 12(22), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229606
Lochmiller, C. R. (2021). Conducting thematic analysis with qualitative data. The Qualitative Report, 26(6), 2029-2044. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2021.5008
Laal, M., & Laal, M. (2012). Collaborative learning: What is it?. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 491-495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.092
Lämsä, J., Hämäläinen, R., Koskinen, P., Viiri, J., & Lampi, E. (2021). What do we do when we analyse the temporal aspects of computer-supported collaborative learning? A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 33, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100387
McKnight, J. L., & Russell, C. (2018). The four essential elements of an asset-based community development process. What Is Distinctive about Asset-Based Community Process. ABDC Institute.
Macpherson, A. (2015). Cooperative learning group activities for college courses. Kwantlen Polytechnic University.
Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning, 22(1), 205-222. https://doi.org/doi:10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092
Mataka, T. W., Bhila, T., & Mukurunge, T. (2020). Language in education policy: A barrier to learners' academic and cognitive development across grades: A case of South African teachers ‘narratives. International Journal Of All Research Writings, 2(1), 117-124.
Masriyah, M., Kurniasari, I. & Palupi, E.L.W. (2018). Characteristics of pre-service teachers’ performance in problem posing. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1088, No. 1, p. 012115). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1088/1/012115
Mertens, D. M. (2010). Transformative mixed methods research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6) 469–474. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410364612
Kiger, M. E., & Varpio, L. (2020). Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Medical teacher, 42(8), 846-854. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030
Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning, 22(1), 205-222.
Malinga, C. B., Jita, L. C., & Bada, A. A (2022). Comparing the organisational infrastructure for instructional leadership in natural sciences teaching among formerly segregated schools in Gauteng. International Journal of Educational Best Practices, 6(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.32851/ijebp.v6n1
Milliken, A., Wang, W., Cateté, V., Martin, S., Gomes, N., Dong, Y., ... & Martens, C. (2021). Planit! A new integrated tool to help novices design for open-ended projects. In Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 232-238). https://doi.org/10.1145/3408877.3432552
Mavhandu-Mudzusi, A. H. (2018). The couple interview as a method of collecting data in interpretative phenomenological analysis studies. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 17(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917750994
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Nyumba, T., Wilson, K., Derrick, C. J., & Mukherjee, N. (2018). The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9(1), 20-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12860
OECD/ACET. (2020). Quality infrastructure in 21st century Africa: Prioritising, accelerating and scaling up in the context of Pida (2021-30). https://www.oecd.org/dev/Africa-Quality-infrastructure-21st-century.pdf
Ogedi, P. O., & Obionu, P. C. (2017). unconducive learning environment as a threat to teaching and learning activities at basic education level in Imo State Nigeria. Multidisciplinary Journal of Research Development, 26(2), 1-8.
Omodan, B. I. (2020a). The vindication of decoloniality and the reality of COVID-19 as an emergency of unknown in rural universities. International Journal of Sociology of Education, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.17583/rise.2020.5495
Omodan, B. I. (2020b). Assessment of group tasks as a decolonial pedagogy in university classrooms. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(11), 5479 -5488. https://doi/10.13189/ujer.2020.081151
Omodan, B. I. (2023). Causes and Institutional Responses of Social Unrest in South African Universities. SAGE Open, 13(4), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231218775
Rehman, A. A., & Alharthi, K. (2016). An introduction to research paradigms. International Journal of Educational Investigations, 3(8), 51-59.
Riivari, E., Kivijärvi, M., & Lämsä, A. M. (2021). Learning teamwork through a computer game: for the sake of performance or collaborative learning? Educational technology research and development, 69, 1753-1771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10009-4
Russell, V. (2020). Language anxiety and the online learner. Foreign Language Annals, 53(2), 338-352. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12461
Sedrakyan, G., Malmberg, J., Verbert, K., Järvelä, S., & Kirschner, P. A. (2020). Linking learning behavior analytics and learning science concepts: Designing a learning analytics dashboard for feedback to support learning regulation. Computer in Human Behavior, 107, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.004
Us Saqlain, N., Shafqat, A., & Hassan, A. (2020). Perception analysis of English language teachers about use of contextualised text for teaching ESP. The Asian ESP Journal, 16(5.1), 275-299.
Sancar, R., Atal, D., & Deryakulu, D. (2021). A new framework for teachers’ professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 101, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103305
Surmiak, A. (2018). September. Confidentiality in qualitative research involving vulnerable participants: Researchers’ perspectives. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 19(3), 393-418. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-19.3.3099
Sutton, P. S., & Shouse, A. W. (2016). Building a culture of collaboration in schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 97(7), 69-73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721716641653
Syakur, A., & Sabat, Y. (2020). The effectiveness of cooperative learning (STAD and PBL type) on E-learning sustainable development in higher education. Journal of Development Research, 4(1), 53-61. https://doi.org/10.28926/jdr.v4i1.98
Susak, M., (2016). Factors that affect classroom participation [Master's Thesis, Rochester Institute of Technology]. RIT Croatia. https://repository.rit.edu/theses/9370
Tümen-Aky?ld?z, S., & Ahmed, K.H. (2021). An overview of qualitative research and focus group discussion. Journal of Academic Research in Education, 7(1), 1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.17985/ijare.866762
Uleanya, C. (2022). Rural undergraduate university students’ learning challenges in Africa: Case study of Nigeria and South Africa. African Identities, 20(1), 89-117. https://doi.org/10.1080/14725843.2020.1813083
Uleanya, C., Gamede, B. T., & Kutame, A. P. (2020). Rural and irrelevant: exploration of learning challenges among undergraduates’ rural universities. African Identities, 18(4), 377-391. doi.org/10.1080/14725843.2020.1767037
Wamoyi, J., Buller, A. M., Nyato, D., Kyegombe, N., Meiksin, R., & Heise, L. (2018). Eat and you will be eaten. A qualitative study exploring costs and benefits of age-disparate sexual relationships in Tanzania and Uganda: Implications for girls’ sexual and reproductive health interventions. Reproductive Health, 15(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-018-0650-0
Walker, C. (2018). Place-based giving schemes: Funding, engaging and creating stronger communities. The Researchery, 1-67.
Yang, H. H., Zhu, S., & MacLeod, J. (2018). Promoting education equity in rural and underdeveloped areas: Cases on computer-supported collaborative teaching in China. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(6), 2393-2405. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/89841
Yayeh, F. A. (2021). Focus group discussion as a data collection tool in economics. Daagu International Journal of Basic & Applied Research-DIJBAR. 3(1), 52-61.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 Oyinlola Omolara Adebola
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
