No doctoral studies without hurdles: A review on pathways to prevent dropouts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38140/ijer-2024.vol6.14Keywords:
Completion, challenges, doctoral studies, dropout, retention, successAbstract
Traditionally, doctoral studies take at least three to six years of full-time study, depending on the country and institution. However, the number of doctoral students who complete their studies in the prescribed time does not meet the expectations of the scientific community. Many students who enrol in a doctoral programme either drop out or do not complete it within the expected time frame. The literature is replete with evidence of the challenges faced by early career researchers, but there is still little reported on how to bridge the existing and perceived barriers that continue to undermine doctoral study retention. These and other obstacles must be addressed and combated by questioning the root causes of students dropping out of their studies. Thus, this study sought to suggest pathways to overcome these and other obstacles by providing a coherent overview of what we need to do and how. The methodology used included a thorough review of international accredited peer reviewed articles extracted from the SCOPUS multidisciplinary database. A total of 24 articles relevant to the topic were thus selected. The key finding of this initiative is that doctoral students face wide-ranging financial, academic, and social challenges that need to be addressed innovatively to improve the timely realisation of the successful completion of their studies.
Keywords: Completion, challenges, doctoral studies, dropout, retention, success
References
Adelowotan, M. (2021). Software, method, and analysis: Reflections on the use of ATLAS.ti in a Doctoral Research Study. Eurasian Journal of Economics and Finance, 9(3), 189-204. https://doi.org/10.15604/ejef.2021.09.03.004
Alves, P., Lopes, A., Cruz-Correia, R., & Menezes, I. (2023). The interrupted journey: factors and processes related to withdrawal, re-enrolment and dropout from doctoral education. Higher Education, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01113-w
Aristovnik, A., Kerži?, D., Ravšelj, D., Tomaževi?, N., & Umek, L. (2020). Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on life of higher education students: A global perspective. Sustainability, 12(8438), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208438
Bahnson, M., Sallai, G., Jwa, K., & Berdanier, C. (2023). Mitigating Ceiling Effects in a Longitudinal Study of Doctoral Engineering Student Stress and Persistence. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 18, 199-227. https://doi.org/10.28945/5118
Beasy, K., Emery, S., & Crawford, J. (2021). Drowning in the shallows: an Australian study of the PhD experience of wellbeing. Teaching in Higher Education, 26(4), 602–618. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1669014
Bekova, S. (2021). Does employment during doctoral training reduce the PhD completion rate? Studies in Higher Education, 46(6), 1068–1080. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1672648
Bernardo, A. B., Tuero, E., Cervero, A., Dobarro , A., & Galve-González, C. (2020). Bullying and cyberbullying: Variables that influence university dropout. Media Education Research Journal, 61-69. http://hdl.handle.net/10760/40064
Borrella, I., Caballero-Caballero, S., & Ponce-Cueto, E. (2019, June). Predict and intervene: Addressing the dropout problem in a MOOC-based program. In Proceedings of the sixth (2019) ACM conference on learning@ scale (pp. 1-9). https://doi.org/10.1145/3330430.3333634
Breitenbach, E. (2019). Evaluating a model to increase doctorate program completion rates: A Focus on Social Connectedness and Structure. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 14, 217-236. https://doi.org/10.28945/4239
Brunton, G., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2020). Innovations in framework synthesis as a systematic review method. Research Synthesis Methods, 11, 316–330. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1399
Cloete, N., Mouton, J., & Sheppard, C. (2015). Doctoral education in South Africa. African Minds.
Corcelles, M., Cano, M., Liesa, E., & González-Ocamp, G. (2019). Positive and negative experiences related to doctoral study conditions. Higher Education Research and Development, 38(5), 922–939. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1602596
Creswell, J. W., & Plano, C. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks.
Diem, A., & Wolter, S. C. (2019). A place too crowded to study: The impact of student cohort growth on the probability of university dropout. Hungarian Educational Research Journal, 9(2), 189-212. https://doi.org/10.1556/063.9.2019.1.20
Elliota, L. D., & Kobayashi, S. (2019). How can PhD supervisors play a role in bridging academic cultures? Teaching in Higher Education, 24(8), 911–929. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1517305
Fook, C. Y., Supramanian, K., Ismail, I. S., Ismail, H. M., & Hassan, Z. (2023). Tinto’s Explanatory Model of The Dropout of Doctorate Students in a Malaysian Public University. Asian Journal of University Education, 19(3), 547-562. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v19i3.23494
Graham, C. D., & Massyn, L. (2019). Interaction equivalency theorem: Towards interaction support of non-traditional doctoral students. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 14, 187. https://doi.org/10.28945/4238
Gittings, G., Bergman, M., Shuck, B., & Ros, K. (2018). The impact of student attributes and program characteristics on doctoral degree completion. New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development, 30(3), 3 - 22. https://doi.org/10.1002/nha3.20220
Hardre, P. L., Liao, L., Dorri, Y., & Stoesz, M. B. (2019). Modeling American graduate students’ perceptions predicting dropout intentions. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 14, 105-132. https://doi.org/10.28945/4161
Holmes, J. L., & Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. (2020). The Development and Validation of the Distance Doctoral Program Integration Scale. Online Learning, 24(4), 182-203. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i4.1951
Hudson, M. D., Spaulding, L. S., Ford, A. Y., & Jones, L. E. (2020). Growing grit to produce doctoral persistence. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 15, 705-736. https://doi.org/10.28945/4671
Kalpokas, N., & Radivojevic, I. (2022). Bridging the Gap Between Methodology and Qualitative Data Analysis Software: A Practical Guide for Educators and Qualitative Researchers. Sociological Research Online, 27(2), 313–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/13607804211003579
Litalien, D., & Guay, F. (2015). Dropout intentions in PhD studies: A comprehensive model based on interpersonal relationships and motivational resources. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 218–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.03.004
Liu, C., Wang, L., Qi, R., Wang, W., Jia, S., Shang, D., Shao, Y., Yu, M., Zhu, X., Yan, S., Chang, Q & Zhao, Y. (2019) Prevalence and associated factors of depression and anxiety among doctoral students: the mediating effect of mentoring relationships on the association between research self-efficacy and depression/anxiety. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 195-208.
Mathies , C., & Cantwell, B. (2022). Intra-regional mobility of PhD students in the European Union: the outcomes of region-making. Policy Reviews in Higher Education, 6(2), 230–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322969.2022.2105256
McKeown, S., & Mir, Z. M. (2020). Considerations for conducting systematic reviews: evaluating the performance of different methods for de-duplicating references. Systematic Reviews, 10(38), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01583-y
MHRD. (2019). All India survey on higher education 2018–19. Government of India: Ministry of Human Resource Development.
Mirick, R. G., & Wladkowski, S. P. (2019). Making it work: Pregnant and parenting doctoral students’ attributions of persistence. Advances in Social Work, 19(2), 349-368. https://doi.org/10.18060/23220
Pranckute, R. (2021). Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World. Publications, 9(12), 1-52. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9010012
Prieto, L. P., Pishtari, G., Dimitriadis, Y., Rodríguez-Triana, M. J., Ley, T., & Odriozola-González, P. (2022). Single-case learning analytics: Feasibility of a human-centred analytics approach to support doctoral education. OSF Preprints. October, 28.
Pyhältö, K., Peltonen, J., Anttila, H., Frick, L. L., & Jager, P. D. (2022). Engaged and/or burnt out? Finnish and South African doctoral students’ experiences. Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education, 2398-4686. https://doi.org/10.1108/SGPE-02-2021-0013
Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. (2019). Toward understanding factors salient to doctoral students’ persistence: The development and preliminary validation of the doctoral academic-family integration inventory. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 14, 237-258.
Sala-Bubaré , A., & Castelló, M. (2017). Exploring the relationship between doctoral students’ experiences and research community positioning. Studies in Continuing Education, 39(1), 16–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2016.1216832
Schalkwyk, F. B., LIll, M. H., & Cloete, N. (2021). Brain circuity: The case of South Africa as a hub for doctoral education. South African Journal of Science, 117, 9-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2021/10674
Shahnawaz, M. G., & Siddiqi, N. (2022). Examining toxic supervision in higher education in India. Higher Education Evaluation and Development, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1108/HEED-06-2021-0047
Smit, B., & Scherman, V. (2021). Computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software for scoping reviews: A case of ATLAS.ti. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211019140
Smith, A., & García, H. A. (2018). Increasing the trickle: A proposed critical multiculturalist conceptual model to increase the pipeline to a more diverse STEM doctorate population. Journal for Multicultural Education, 12(3), 206-220. https://doi.org/10.1108/JME-09-2016-0052
Stubb, J., Pyhältö, K. & Lonka K. (2012). The experienced meaning of working with a PHD Thesis. Scandinavian Journal of Education Research, 56(4), 439–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2011.599422
Sverdlik, A., Hall, N. C., McAlpine, L., & Hubbard, K. (2018). The PhD experience: A review of the factors influencing doctoral students’ completion, achievement, and wellbeing. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 13, 361-388. https://doi.org/10.28945/4113
Tomlinson, J., Medlinskiene, K., Cheong, V.-L., Khan, S., & Fylan, B. (2019). Patient and public involvement in designing and conducting doctoral research: the whys and the hows. Research Involvement and Engagement, 5(23), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-019-0155-1
Trakulsunti, Y., Antony, J., Jayaraman, R., & Tortorella, G. (2022). The application of operational excellence methodologies in logistics: A systematic review and directions for future research. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2022.2071695
Waight, E., & Giordano, A. (2018). Doctoral students’ access to non-academic support for mental health. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 40(4), 390–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2018.1478613
van Rooij, E., Fokkens-Bruinsma, M., & Jansen, E. (2021). Factors that influence PhD candidates’ success: the importance of PhD project characteristics. Studies in Continuing Education, 43(1), 48-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2019.1652158
Woolston, C. (2019). PhDs: The tortuous truth. Nature, 575 (7782), 403–406.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 Shadreck Muchaku, Malose Moses Tjale, Marizvikuru Mwale, Grey Magaiza
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
